Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1953 )


Menu:
  • s
    THEAYTORNEY               GENERAL
    OFTEXAS
    August 31, 1953
    Hon. E. H. Thornton, Jr. Opinion No. S-94
    Chairman
    State Hi way Commission Re: Service of members of the
    Austin 1$h
    , Texas             State Highway Commission
    as ex-officio members of
    the Texas Turnpike Authority
    as provided in House Bill 4,
    Dear Mr. Thornton:           Acts 53rd Legislature.
    You have requested an opinion in regard to cer-
    tain portions of Chapter 410, Acts of the 53rd Legisla-
    ture, codified in Vernon'.sas Article 6674v, V.C.S., which
    creates The Texas Turnpike Authority. Your specific ques-
    tions are as follows:
    "1. Can we serve ex-officio as a Member
    of the Board of Directors of such Authority
    without violating either Section 33 or Sec-
    tion 40 of Article 1.6of the Constitution of
    Texas?
    '2. Since each of;us has already taken
    an oath of office at the time we qualified
    for our respective positions on the Highway
    Commission, are we required to take an addi-
    tional oath as ex-officio members of the
    Board of Directors of the Toll Road Author-
    ity? If we are so required, would we then
    be h~oldingtwo offices in violation of either
    of the Sections of Article 16 of the Consti-
    tution of Texas aforementioned?
    "3. Are we, as ex-officio members of
    the Board of Directors, required to file a
    surety bond in the penal sum of $25,000.00?
    If we are so required, would we then be hold-
    ing two offices in violation of either of
    the Sections of Article 16 of the Constitu-
    tion of Texas aforementioned?
    . .. .
    Hon. E. H. Thornton, Jr., page 2 (S-94)
    "4. If we are required to execute a
    surety bond in the penal sum of $25,OOO,OO,
    will we, or any of the appointed Directors
    of the Toll Road Authority, be required to
    execute such bond prior to the time any
    Turnpike Revenue Bonds, under the provisions
    of House Bill No. 4, are actually issued?
    "5. If we are required to execute a
    surety bond in the penal sum of $25,OOO.OO,
    should we do so in our capacity as ex-officio
    Members of the Board of Directors of the Toll
    Road Authority or in o'urcapacity as Members
    of the Highway Commission?"
    Section 3 of Article 6674~ provides that each
    member of the Texas State Highway Commission shall serve
    ex-officio as a member of the Board of Directors of the
    Texas Turnpike Authority. Such section provides in
    part:
    'The Legislature imposes on any Director
    who may be a member of the State Highway Com-
    mission the extra duties required hereunder."
    The ex-officio duties of the,members of the
    Texas Highway Commission sre'additional duties required
    to be performed by such officers without additional com-
    pensation. Therefore, acts of the ex-officio members
    of the Board of Directors of the Texas Turnpike Author-
    ity are by virtue of the duties imposed on Highway Com-
    missioners. The act does not create a separate and
    distinct office insofar as it applies to such members,
    and Sections 33 and 40 of Article XVI of the Constitution
    of Texas have no application. Jones v. Alexander, 
    122 Tex. 328
    , 
    59 S.W.2d 1080
    (1933); Eucaline Medicine Co.
    v. Standard Investment Co.; 
    25 S.W.2d 259
    (Tex.Civ.App.
    error ref      930 ; Irwin v. State, 
    147 Tex. Crim. 6
    , 177
    S .W .2d 9'$(:&+   . Therefore, the performance of such
    ex-officio duties would not violate the provisions of
    Sections 33 and 40 of Article XVI of the Constitution of
    Texas.
    The Constitutional oath required of the ex-
    officio Directors of the Texas T~urnpikeAuthority is the
    same oath that such Highway Commissioners have already
    Hon. E. H. Thornton, Jr., page 3 (S-94)
    taken. Therefore, it wo'uldbe a meaningless thing to
    require them to again take the same oath upon assuming
    their additional duties. Furthermore, as stated above
    the members of the Texas Highway Commission hold only
    one office.
    The statute is plain that each Director shall
    execute a surety bond in the sum of $25,000 "before the
    issuance of any turnpike bonds." Since this bond is
    conditioned upon the performance of the additional duties
    and is separate and distinct from the bond executed by
    the Highway Commissioners under Article 6664, V.C.S., a
    Highway Commissioner would be required to execute such
    bond before the issuance of turnpike bonds. Such bond
    should be executed as Director of the Texas Turnpike
    Authority in compliance with Section 3 of Article 6674~.
    SUMMARY
    Members of the Texas Highway Commission
    are ex-officio Directors of the Texas Turnpike
    Authority. The performance of such duties by
    them does not violate either~Sections 33 or
    40 of the Constitution of Texas. They are not
    required to take an additional oath but are
    required to execute a surety bond in the sum
    of $25,000 before the issuance of any turnpike
    bonds.
    Yours very truly,
    APPROVED:                            JOHN BEN SHEPPERD
    Attorney General
    J. C. Davis. Jr.
    County Affairs Division
    W. V. Geppert                               kves
    Reviewer                                     v-    .I/
    Burnell Waldrep                     ~4Ei-yxd;4-
    Executive Assistant                            Assistants
    John Ben Shepperd
    Attorney General
    JR:EG:am
    

Document Info

Docket Number: S-94

Judges: John Ben Shepperd

Filed Date: 7/2/1953

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017