Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1978 )


Menu:
  •    The Attorney General of Texas
    June 20, 1978
    Honorable Ben T. Reyes                              Opinion No. H- 118 7
    Chairman
    House Committee on Rules                            Re: Validity of a homestead tax
    P. 0. Box 2910                                      exemption   for senior citizens
    Austin, Texas 78769                                 whose income is limited to a
    certain amount.
    Dear Representative     Reyes:
    You have requested our opinion regarding the validity          of a homestead
    tax exemption for senior citizens.
    Article 8, section    l-b of the Texas Constitution    provides, in pertinent
    part:
    Sec. l-b. (a) Three Thousand Dollars ($3,000) of the
    assessed taxable value of all residence homesteads of
    married or unmarried adults, male or female, including
    those living alone, shall be exempt from all taxation
    for all State purposes.
    (b) From and after January 1, 1973, the governing
    body of any county, city, town, school district, or
    other political subdivision of the State may exempt by
    its own action not less than Three Thousand Dollars
    ($3,000) of the assessed value of residence homesteads
    of married or unmarried persons sixty-five (65) years
    of age or older, including those living alone, from ad
    valorem taxes thereafter levied by the political sub-
    division.
    You advise that the Board of Education of the Houston Independent               School
    District recently enacted the following resolution:
    Section 1 That the Board of Education of the
    Houston Independent School District grant a $5,000
    homestead tax exemption to citizens sixty-five years
    p.   4782
    .
    ,
    Honorable Ben T. Reyes         -   Page 2    (R-1187)
    of age or older who timely file a sworn application with the
    District’s Tax Assessor-Collector,   the exemption to be
    granted according to the procedures and under the condi-
    tions employed by the City of Houston, the Tax Assessor and
    Collector of the Houston Independent School District.
    Section 2 That the Board of Education of the Houston
    Independent School District grant an additional $10,000
    homestead tax exemption to citizens sixty-five years of age
    or older (for a total of $lS,OOO), who timely file a sworn
    application on a form provided by the District, through
    which the taxpayer establishes that his or her income does
    not exceed $5,000 annually if only the taxpayer claiming the
    exemption resides in the residence homestead, and a
    combined total of $7,000 annually if the taxpayer claiming
    the exemption and his or her spouse reside in the residence
    homestead, the exemption to be granted according to the
    procedures and under the conditions employed by the City of
    Houston, the Tax Assessor and Collector of the Houston
    Independent School District.
    You ask whether the board may validly condition      this additional $10,000 exemption
    upon the taxpayer’s annual income.
    A political subdivision is empowered by article 8, section l-b to grant to every
    person a tax exemption on certain property, provided the property is the residence
    homestead of the taxpayer, and provided further that the taxpayer is at least 65
    years of age. The board of education, while authorizing an exemption in the
    amount of $5,000 to all taxpayers on the sole basis of the two constitutional
    criteria, proposes an additional exemption for those taxpayers who also qualify
    under an income test.
    The Supreme Court of Texas has frequently declared that “lax exemptions are
    subject to strict construction     since they are the antithesis of equality and
    uniformity.”    Hilltop Village, Inc. v. Kerrville Independent School District, 
    426 S.W.2d 943
    , 948 (Tex. 1968); see also Davies v. Meyer, 
    541 S.W.2d 827
    , 829 (Tex.
    1976). In our opinion, the school board may not limit the grant of an exemption to
    any condition not derived from the constitutional     amendment itself. ln Sparkman
    v. State, 
    58 So. 2d 431
    (Fla. 1952), a constitutional provision authorized a homestead
    tax exemption of $5,000. The legislature subsequently required that any person
    claiming the exemption must have been a legal resident of the state for one year
    prior thereto. The Supreme Court of Florida held that
    the class or group entitled to homestead exemption under
    the constitution, and the class or group entitled to such right
    P.   4783
    ,
    .
    Honorable Ben T. Reyes    -   Page 3     (H-1187)
    or privilege under the      constitution   as attempted  to be
    restricted by legislative    enactment,    are quite materially
    different.
    As a result, the court found the residency requirement    
    invalid. 58 So. 2d, at 432
    .
    Likewise, the Texas Constitution empowers a political subdivision to grant a
    homestead tax exemption on the basis of the taxpayer’s age and residence on the
    homestead property.    To these constitutional   conditions, the school board has
    appended a third based on income. When a constitutional amendment has
    specifiiedl . . . circumstances and purposes . . . the Legis-
    lature is without power to add to or withdraw from the
    circumstances and purposes specified.
    Deason v. Orange County Water Control & Improvement District No. 1, 
    244 S.W.2d 981
    , 984 (Tex. 1952). It is our opinion, therefore, that under the present language of
    the constitution  a school district may not limit the grant of a homestead tax
    exemption for senior citizens to those whose income is below a particular amount.
    SUMMARY
    Under the current language of the constitution, a school
    district may not limit the grant of a homestead tax
    exemption for senior citizens to those whose income is
    below a particular amount.
    C. ROBERT HEATH. Chairman
    Opinion Committee ’
    P.   4784
    

Document Info

Docket Number: H-1187

Judges: John Hill

Filed Date: 7/2/1978

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017