Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1968 )


Menu:
  •     Ron.  Robert S. Calvert                Opinion   No.+177
    Comptroller  of Public
    Accounts                             Re:   Construction   of Section
    Austin, Texas                                8(C) of Article   678f,
    Vernon's Civil Statutes,
    <                                                relating   to the certi,ff-
    cation by the Comptroller
    that a contract   awarded
    by the State is not in
    excess of the amount avail-
    .Dear Mr. Calvert:                           able for such project.
    Your request    for   an opinion   reads,    in part,     as
    follows   :
    "The State Building Commission has awarded
    a contract     for the 'construction     of certain public
    works for a total contract         price of two million
    eight hundred ninety-six         thousand and one hundred
    dollars    ($2,896,100.00),      approximately   one million
    dollars of which is to be paid from funds appro-
    priated by the Congress and alloted           to the State
    of Texas under the Community Health Centers Act
    (42 U.S. Code, sees. 2681-2687).            Documents have
    .been furnished by the Dallas Regional Office,             De-
    partment of Health, Education and Welfare, U. S.
    Government, which reflect         that  the Federal  funds
    have been approved and obligated           for the public
    ~works project.        However,   the funds have not been
    transferred      to the State,    and it is anticipated
    that the funds will be furnished to State author-
    ities   on a quarterly      basis after the construction
    is started.
    “Prior   to the award of the contract        the pro-
    posed contract    award was forwarded to the Comp-
    troller   for certification      of available    funds.   In
    those instances     in which sufficient      State funds
    are available 114 Tex. 11
    , 262 S.W.
    of Control,    404 S.W.Zd 810 (Tex.Sup. 1966).       In Charles
    Scribner's    Sons v. 
    Marra, supra
    , the Court was considering
    the validity    of a contract   for the purchase of certain
    books for a period of five years.        The obligation   of the
    contract was not to buy a fixed number or amount of books
    but only so many as needed by the schools of the State.
    The Court held, therefore,      that since the contract did not
    make a charge on the future revenues of the State, no debt
    was created nor was Section 6 of Article       VIII of the Con-
    stitution    of Texas violated.
    In Fort Worth Cavalry Club v. 
    Sheppard, supra
    , the
    Court held a 'lease contract for a period of five years void,
    since the adjutant general had the implied power to make a
    contract  onlv within the amounts of the appropriation,  and
    for the period of the appropriation.
    In City of.Big  Spring v. Board of 
    Control, supra
    ,
    the Court held that a contract  whereby the city agreed to
    furnish water to the State at a fixed-rate  "as-long  as the
    State of Texas shall in good faith maintain and operate
    -852-
    -.
    :   ,.     .
    Ron. Robert       S. Calvert,     page 4,       (M-177)
    said   hospital     on said     site"   did not create    a debt.
    In Nichols v. State, -32 S.W. 452 (Tex.Civ.App.
    1895, error ref.1 the State was held not liable under a
    - contract    entered into by the State involving    an amount
    exceeding the amount available     for such project,   and the
    legislature    was held to be without power to ratify    the
    contract    to the extent it exceeded the appropriation.
    In view of the foregoing,       it is our opinion
    that  the purpose of Section 8(C) of Article           
    678f, supra
    ,
    is to prevent the awarding of a contract           which would attempt
    to create obligations      in violation     of Section 49 of Article
    III of the Constitution      of Texas.      Section 8(C) of Article
    678f is designed to enable agencies of the State to determine
    in advance of the award of a particular           contract whether the
    obligation    to be created by the award is payable out of monies
    available    for such project.      In this respect,      the certifica-
    tion  of the Comptroller with regard to contracts            is similar to
    the certification     of the Comptroller       under the provisions      of
    Section 49a of Article      III of the Constitution        of Texas re-
    lating to appropriations       being.within     the amount estimated to
    be available     in the affected    funds.
    A contract  for the construction    of certain public
    works payable out of State funds, appropriated          by the Leg-
    islature,    and out of Federal funds appropriated       by the Con-
    qress, and allocated     to the State of Texas does not create
    a debt in violation     of Section 49 of Article    III   of the Con-
    8titution    of Texas when the amount of State funds appropriated
    by the Legislature,     together with the amount of Federal        funds
    approved and obligated      for such project,   is equal to or exceed
    the amount of the awarded contract.         Under such circumstances,
    the Comptroller     of Public Accounts is authorized      to execute
    certificates    provided in Section 8(C) of Article       678f.    Under
    the facts stated in your request,       in  answer to   your  questions
    (a) and (b), it is our opinion that you are authorized          to
    make the certification      provided in Section 8(C) of Article
    678f, for the reason that the contract        awarded is not in ex-
    cess of the amount made available       for such project.
    .Zn~ answer to your questions  .(c) and (a), it is noted
    that money can only be drawn from the State Treasury pursuant
    to specific    appropriations made by the Legislature.       Article
    VIII, Section 6, Texas Constitution.      Therefore,    the Comp-
    troller   does not have authority   to pay out funds in the State
    Treasury except in pursuance to specific       appropriations,     and
    where obligated    Federal funds are to be deposited      in the State
    Treasury and which have been appropriated       by the Legislature,
    progress payments payable from these funds may not be made
    -853-
    Hon. Robert     S. Calvert,   page 5,    (M-177)
    until   such Federal funds have been received   by the State.
    State funds appropriated    by the Legislature,  on the other
    hand, may be expended by progress payments until the appro-
    priation   has been exhausted.
    SUMMARY
    -------.
    A contract   for the construction     of certain
    public works payable out of State funds appro-
    priated by the Legislature      and out of Federal
    funds appropriated      by the Congress and allocated
    to the State of Texas does not create a debt in
    violation    of Section   49 of Article   III of the
    Constitution     of Texas when the amount of State
    funds,appropriated      by the Legislature,    together
    with the amount of Federal funds approved and
    obligated    for such project,   is equal to or ex-
    ceed the amount of the awarded contract.           Under
    such circumstances. the Corndroller         of Public
    Accounts is authorized      to ekecute certificates
    provided in Section 8(C) of Article         678f, Ver-
    non's Civil Statutes.
    w      truly   yours,
    .C. MARTIN
    rney General of Texas
    Prepared by John Reeves
    Assistant Attorney General
    APPROVED:
    OPINION COMMITTEE
    Hawthorne Phillips, Chairman‘
    Kerns Taylor, Co-Chairman
    W. V. Geppert
    Harold Kennedy
    w. 0. Shultz
    Bill Allen
    .A. J. CARUBBI, JR.
    Staff Legal Assistant
    -854-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: M-177

Judges: Crawford Martin

Filed Date: 7/2/1968

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017