Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1979 )


Menu:
  •                       The Attorney              General of Texas
    December        17,   1979
    MARK WHITE
    Attorney General
    Honorable Richard Morales, Sr.               Opinion No. ``-192
    Webb County Attorney
    1610San Bernard0                             Re: Whether an elected official
    Laredo, Texas 78040                          may      designate  a   nonelected
    alternate to serve on the board of
    directors of a regional planning
    commission.
    Dear Mr. Morales:
    You have asked whether a member of the Board of Directors of the
    South Texas Development Council who Is a locally elected official, may
    designate a non-officeholder alternate to serve in his absence. The Council
    is a regional planning commission established under the terms of article
    lOllm, V.T.C.S. The Council is a political subdivision of the state with the
    authority to contract, purchase or lease real property, and employ a staff.
    
    Id. S 4.
    It lacks the power to tax, but it may receive funds or grants from
    %y source. 
    Id. S 6.
    The cooperating governmental units by joint agreement
    determine th=umber        and qualifications of the governing body - the Board
    of Directors      
    Id. S 5.
    At least two thirds of the membership must be
    elected officialsxom     county or municipal government.     The governing body
    of the South Texas Development Council consists of eighteen members The
    means and methods of the operation of the regional commission is
    determined by the participating governmental units. s
    Generally, governmental powers must be exercised by the officials
    designated by law to execute public duties.         Moody v. Texas Water
    Commission, ~373 S.VV.2d 793 (Tex. Civ. App. - Austin 1963, writ ref’d
    n.r.e.).     ass otherwise permitted by law or the ministerial nature of the
    duties, an official may not delegate his authority to another.    Newsom v.
    Adams, 
    451 S.W.2d 948
    (Tex. Civ. App. - Beaumont 1970, no writ); Krug v.
    Lincoln National Life Insurance Co., 
    245 F.2d 848
    (5th Cir. 1957). Attorney
    General Opinions WW-66 (1957); V-350 (1947). However, article lOllm,
    section 5, allows considerable discretion to the participating governmental
    units as to the makeup of the governing body so long as elected officials
    constitute two thids of the body. By joint agreement the cooperating units
    determine the number and qualifications of the members of the governing
    body, the manner of cooperation, and the means and methods of the
    P.   317
    Honorable Richard Morales, Sr.     -   Page Two    (MW-102)
    operation of the regional planning commission. We believe that this broad authority would
    permit a joint agreement which would provide for the designation of alternates so long as
    two thirds of the acting members are elected officials.  Absent such a joint agreement,
    however, we do not believe that the designation of alternates is permissible under the
    authorities cited above.
    SUMMARY
    Designation of alternate      members to serve on the board of
    directors of a regional planning commission is permissible only if so
    provided by joint agreement among the participating governmental
    unit so long as two thirds of those acting as board members are
    elected officials of a county or incorporated municipality.
    Very truly yourq    /I
    MARK     WHITE
    Attorney General of Texas
    JOHN W. FAINTER, JR.
    First Assistant Attorney General
    TED L. HARTLEY
    Executive Assistant Attorney General
    Prepared by David B. Brooks
    Assistant Attorney General
    APPROVED:
    OPINION COMMITTEE
    C. Robert Heath, Chairman
    Jim Allison
    David B. Brooks
    Bob Gammage
    Susan Garrison
    Rick Gilpin
    William G Reid
    P.    318
    

Document Info

Docket Number: MW-102

Judges: Mark White

Filed Date: 7/2/1979

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017