Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1974 )


Menu:
  •                THE        ATTORNEY                         GENERAL
    OF’ =XAS
    Auam~.       TEXAS 787ll
    September             9, 1974
    The Honorable   Margaret  L. Rowland, R. N.                   Opinion   No. H-    395       :’
    Executive Secretary
    Board of Nurse Examiners     for the State                    Re: Circumstances   under
    of Texas                                                    which person not licensed
    55 North Interregional,  Suite 101                            as nurse may perform
    Austin,  Texas   78702                                        professional nursing acts.
    Dear Mrs.   Rowland:.
    You have asked three (3) questions having to do with the performance
    of nursing acts by persons not licensed under the Texas statutes    regulating
    the practice  of professional nursing, Article 4513, V. T. C. S., et o’eq.
    You first ask:
    Does the definition of professional      nursing in
    Section 5 of 4518 [V. T. C. S. ]. taken in conjunction
    with the requirement     of registration   in Section 4
    of 4518 [V. T. C. S. ], permit one employed by a
    Texas hospital to practic,e professional       nursing in
    Texas hospitals   or eLsewhere whether or not they
    .
    are Mcensed by the Texas State Board of Nurse
    Examiners 7
    The definition   of pr,ofessional        nursing     to which you refer    reads:
    ‘Professional    Nursing’ shall be defined for the purpose.6
    of this Act as the performance      for compensation   of any
    nursing act (a) in the observation,      care and counrel of
    the’ill,  injured or infirm; (b) in the maintenance    of
    health or prevention    of illness of others; (c) in the
    administration    of medicationr   or treatmenta   a#
    p.   1848
    ,    .
    The Honorable   Margaret     L. Rowland       page 2   (H-395)
    prescribed     by,a licensed physician or dentist;
    (d) in the supervision      or teaching of nursing,
    insofar as any of the above acts require substantial
    dalined        judgment and skill and insofar as the
    proper performance         of any of the above acts is
    based upon knowledge and application            of the principles
    of biological,    phvsical and social science as acquired
    by a-complete      course in an approved school of pro-
    fes.sional nursing.      The foregoing     shall not be deemed
    to include acts of medical dia.gnosis or prescription             of
    therapeutic     or corrective    measures.       (Emphasis addrd)
    Obviously,  this definition does not encompass    all nursing acts.
    Some nursing acts do not require the Bame high degree of knowledge
    and skill and, therefore,    are not regulated by the “professional”   nursing
    provisions   defined above,
    The requirement of registration to which you refer was impoaed by
    Acts 1969, p. 1571, ch. 476, and is codified as Article 4518 5 4, V. T. C. S.
    It reads:
    Any person practici.ng or offering         to practice
    Fofessional     nurring in this state for      compensation,
    shall hereafter   be required to submit        evidence to the
    Board of Nurse Examiners       that he or      she is qualified
    to practice and shall be registered     as      provided by law.
    (Emphasis added)
    That same Act of the Legislature          amended    Article   4528,   V. T. C.S.,
    which now reads:
    This law shall not be construed to appiy to: the
    gratuitous nursing of the sick by friends; the
    furnishing of nursing care where treatment is
    by prayer or spiritual means alone: acts done
    under the control or supervision  or at the instruc-
    tion of one licensed by the Texas State Board of
    p.   1849
    The Honorable     Margaret    L. Rowland       page 3    (H-395)
    Medical Examiners:        Licensed Vocational   Nurses;
    the practice   of registered    tuberculosis  nurses
    certified  under Article 4528b, Vernon’s       Texas
    Civil Statutes; nor to acts done by persons licensed
    by any board or agency of the State of Texas if
    such acts are authorized by such licensing        statutes.
    (Emphasis added)
    Under the clear language of these statutes,   we think the mere fact
    that one is employed by a Texas hospital is insufficient   by itself to exempt
    anyone from the regulatory   requirements applicable    to professional  nurring,
    and we answer your firot question in the ne,gative.
    Your    second   and third questions    ask:
    (2) With reference    to Article 4528 [V. T. C.S.] in a
    Texas hospital,    can one employed by a Texas hospital
    not licensed to practice professional    nursing in Texas
    do nursing acts ‘under the control or supervisiqn      of
    one licensed to practice     medicine in Texas’ if a physician
    is not actually present and directly controlling    or super-
    vising said unlicensed pe,rson?
    (3) With reference     to Article 4528 [V. T. C. S.], in a Texas
    hoscitai,   can one employed by a ‘Texas hospital not licensed
    to practice   professional    nursing in Texas do nursing acts
    wherein the person licensed to practice        medicine in Texas
    is not present and directly instructing      euch unlicensed
    person?
    These two questions,  in our opinion,          are likewise answered by the
    clear unambiguour  language of the statutes,           and especially the emphasi&ed
    words of Article 4528, supra.
    Whether the acts are performed in a hospital or elsewhere,, or by
    a hospital employee or someone else, does not appear to be the controlling
    The Honorable     Margaret   L.   Rowland     page 4   (H-395)
    factor under the language of Article 4528; the controlling factors appear
    to us to be whether the acts are done under the control or supervision   of
    one licensed    by the Board of Medical Examiners or that they be done at
    the instruction   of a licensee.
    In Attorney General Opinion H-368 we construed a similar statute
    applicable     to the practice    of physical therapy and exempting from licensing
    “employees performing          services   under the direct supervision     of a physLcian
    in a hospital . . . . ” We said that, in our opinion, the provision             did not
    require the constant physical presence             of the physician and that it would
    be satisfied if “the responsible         physician personally     trains and inatrukts
    the hospital employee in the process            to be employed and remains reas,onably
    available    to inspect,   correct,     and direct the work of the employee . . . . ~”
    So, too, we believe that Article 4528. V. T. C: S., does not require
    the constant physical presence         of a physician to authorize the performance
    of professional     nursing acts by one not otherwise licensed to perform       them,
    so long as the responsible        physician personally   assumes   control and
    supervision     of the employee or instructs him in what is to be done, and
    remains reasonably        available to see that the nursing acts are properly
    performed.
    SUMMARY
    Hospital employment       alone does not exempt one
    from etatutory     regulations   concerning  professional
    nursing.     It a physician ham assumed and exercises
    control or supervision      of an unlicensed person per-
    forming professional       nursing duties or has peraonally
    instructed    that person in the acts to be done, that
    person is not precluded by the statutes governing
    professional     nursing from performing     such pro-
    fessional    nursing acts.
    p.   1851
    The Honorable   Margaret    L. Rowland      page 5   (H-395)
    ---+-dLw
    DAVID M. KENDALL.
    Opinion Committee
    Chairman
    lg
    p.   1852
    

Document Info

Docket Number: H-395

Judges: John Hill

Filed Date: 7/2/1974

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017