Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1963 )


Menu:
  •                         MAY 14,   1963
    Honomble Joe Resweber
    County Attorney
    HarTIs county                        Re: Authority of'the Com-
    Houston, Texas                            mlssloners Count tb
    enter into a contract
    for the,sale or rental
    'of IBM data processing
    .cards and copies of
    mlcroPllms of lnstru-
    ments filed In the
    Dear Mr. Resweber:                        County Clerk's office.
    .Youh&e requested the opinion of~thls'office as to
    whether the Gmimis~lbners Court of Harris Count Is author-
    ized to enter Into ;a'ccintract
    <      fbr the sale and.Por rental
    of IBM data processing cqrds and cqples~of mlcrofl~s of
    Instrumentsfiled for'reqoH,lq ,t,he office of,:the.County
    Clerk.
    A proposed'contrict has been submitted together with'
    additional ln~formatlonregarding the exact mechanical pro-
    tiesseaInVolved. Itappears that'the County Clerk prepares
    IBM data carda reflecting each document filed In a real es-
    tate transaction. These~cardsare then used to prepare the
    various indices necessary. Also, microfilm copies are mad6
    of each Instrument filed during a day's business, and these
    microfilms are then melded Into tHeietiaetermicrofilm record.
    After the IBM data cards have perforniedtheir function, they
    are~dlsposedof as waste paper. .Thls disposal Is a parent1
    lawful in view of .AttorneyQeneral's Opinion No. v-k3 (19473,
    which holda that counties have power to dispose of useless".
    or worn out personal property as a nkcessary adjunct of t'he-
    power to conduct county business.
    With reference to the contraot that Is proposed, It
    appears that the County Clerk would be obligated to prepare
    a duplicate set of IBM cards and mlcrof.llmprints. !RllS
    duplicate set apparently could be prepared at the same time
    the original set fs prepared with the expenditureof very
    little extra effort and expense on the part of the County
    Clerk. It should be,emphasized that the materlals'that
    would be delivered to the contractor are materials,speclally
    -367-
    -    .
    Hon. Joe Resweber, page 2 (C-75)
    prepared for hlm by the County Clerk.
    Article 6600, Vernon's Civil Statutes, requires the
    County Clerk to give attested copies of lnatrumentsfiled
    In his office, and requires that the Clerk receive the fee
    set by law therefor. Articles 3930 and 3930a, Vernon's
    Civil Statutes, establish the fee schedule forcopies pre-
    pared by the County Clerk. Assuming,  without so,holdlng,
    that the County Clerk's microfilmedcopies are equivalent to
    the original records, It Is the opinion of this office that
    the CommlsalonersCourt Is without authority to contract
    for the sale of copies of the microfilmed records. Such a
    sale would contravene the fee schedules establishedIn Artl-
    cles 3930 and 3930a, unless the sale price was In accord
    with the fee schedule; this Is clearly not the case here, for
    the contract would then be of no apparent value.
    Assuming that the copies of microfilm records which
    are the subject,of this proposed contract.arenot ,equlvalent
    to the'orlglnal.records,the .contract..,'w.ould'.st.mbe
    beyond
    the power vested In the Commlsslondrs.~,Court.4,'
    :~lh.e
    County
    Clerk would be preparlng,'coRles..of
    ~fllins,.soleIy.f.or
    a proflt-
    making sale under a contract. Such;is notethe,qurpos,e of i:
    the office of counts clerk. and no statutory .lustlflcatlon
    for the action can be found. See Tobln v. &gp;s, 
    107 S.W. 26
    677 ,(Tex.Clv.App.1937, error.ref.!. ~       .,~,
    The same reasonlng,andauthority.apRlleswith equal'
    force to'the preparationand.sale,of!a ,dupllcateset of..IRR.
    data cards reflectingthe daily,,fi+gs,.lnthe CountybClerkls
    office.                                    II
    It Is therefore,theopinionof .,thls office that the
    CommlsslonersCourtha~no authority 'toenter Into a con-
    tract for the sale or rental of I~.data.processlng cards
    and copies of mlcrofllms of lnatrumentsfiled in the County
    Clerk's office, when such sale ls.of the type contemplated
    by the submitted contract.
    SUMMARY            r
    The CcmmlsslonersCourt Is authorized to
    dispose of personal propezjtyfor which'
    the County haa no further use.,.However,
    the County Is not authorizedto prepare
    a.neclalsets ,ofrecords for aale to prl-
    vate contractors'ln,theabaeticeof statu-
    tory authority therefor.
    -   .
    Hon. Joe Resweber, Page 3 (C-75)
    Article 6600, V.C.S., provides the method
    for sale of attested coples of records In
    the office of the County Clerk and a con-
    tract which Is In derogation of this stat-
    ute would be a nullity.
    Yours very truly,
    WAGGONER CARR
    Attorney General
    ML&ma
    w&a,Assistant'
    APPROVED:
    OPINION COMMITTEE
    W. V. Geppert, Chairman
    Pat Bailey
    Howard Fender
    Edward Moffett
    James M. Strock
    APPROVED FOR THE ATTORNEY GENERAL.
    By: Stanton Stone
    

Document Info

Docket Number: C-75

Judges: Waggoner Carr

Filed Date: 7/2/1963

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017