Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1961 )


Menu:
  •                E               EY     GENE
    AS
    November 10, 1961
    Honorable P. Frank Lake             Opinion No. WW-1193
    Secretary of State
    Austin, Texas                       Re:   Filing fees in special
    congressional election
    to be held on December
    Dear Sir:                                 16, 1961.
    Your opinion request reads as follows:
    "Your opinion Is respectfully requested
    concerning the statutory fll~ingfee which must
    accompany.tha application submitted by a person
    to appear upon the official ballot In the special
    election to be held in the 13th Congressional
    District of Texsrson the 16th day of December,
    1961, for the purpose of electing a representative
    in Congress for such district to serve out the un-
    expired term of the Honorable Frank N. Ikard. The
    special election in question was called,by
    Qovernor Daniel on November 8th. The deadline
    for filing ,an application to appear on the ballot
    in such election is, as I have computed it, mld-
    night of November 15th.
    "Article 32a of the Texas Election Code
    (Article 4.10, Vernon's Election Code), which
    applies generally to applications to appear upon
    the ballot at special elections, provides that
    an application to appear on the ballot I * + *
    must be filed not later than thirty (30) days
    before any such special election, and must be
    accompanied with a fee of * * * five dollars
    ($5.00) If a district or county office, * * *.I
    "A new article, designated as Article 32b,
    was added to the Election Code of Texas by Senate
    Bill No. 3, Acts 57th Legislature, Second Called
    Session, 1961. This Act becomes effective on
    Honorable P. Frank Lake, page 2 (ww-1193)
    November 13, 1961 (90 days after August 14, 1961,
    the date of adjournment of the Second Called
    Session of the 57th Legislature). Section la of
    Article 32b reads as follows:
    "'In any special election called to fill
    a vacancy in the office of United States
    Representative in any congressional district
    of the state, the filing fee shall be Five Hundred
    Dollars ($500.00).t
    "The questions specifically submitted are:
    "1. Will the provisions of Article 32a
    providing for a filing fee of $5.00 apply to
    applications received in this office prior to
    midnight of November 12?
    "2. Will the provisions of Section la of
    Article 32b providing for a filing fee of
    $500.00 apply to applications which are received
    In this office between midnight of November 12
    and the deadline for filing such application In
    the election; or
    “3.  Will the provisions of Section la of
    Article 32b apply to all applications received
    in this office after November 8 and prior to
    November 15 deadline?"
    Article 32b of the Election Code, which becomes
    effective on November 13, 1961, can have no force as law
    before that date. Whether it will operate retroactively
    after its effective date on fees paid before that date
    depends, first, on whether the Legislature Intended to make
    it retroactive, and, secondly, on whether such retroactive
    operation would impair any vested rights. Even if the
    Legislature did so intend, It could not be applied to Impair
    a vested right in violation of Article 1, Section 16 of the
    Texas Constitution, which provides that "no . . . retroactive
    law . . . shall be made." This constitutional provision is
    construed merely as forbidding the enactment of any law that
    will prejudicially affect existing; vested rights, or the
    operation of a law In such a manner as to have that effect.
    r   -
    Honorable P. Frank Lake, page 3 (WW-1193)
    The inhibition is not ordinarily extended to a procedural or
    remedial statute, or, in fact, to any act which does not
    disturb or impair vested.rlghts. 39 Tex.Jur., Statutes,
    Sec. 27. In our opinion, a person who files his application
    as a candidate prior to November 13, and pays the filing fee
    prescribed In the statute in effect on the date of filing,
    will not acquire any vested rightwhich would prevent a
    subsequent change in the election proceduies.
    Since there would be no constitutional obstacle
    to making the fee provision of Article 32b operative retro-
    actively in elections called before Its effective date, the
    answer to your questions depends on whether the Legislature
    Intended for It to have euch operation.
    We have found no case construing the effect of
    statutory changes in election procedures which become effeo-
    tlve during the interval between the date on which an elec-
    tion Is called and the date on which it is held. The closest
    analogy is found in cases dealing with changes in procedure
    in pending legal proceedings. The Legislature may change
    procedures In pending proceedings, and a statute changing
    proceedings prima facie applies to pending proceedings.
    Walker v. Lylea, 
    45 S.W.2d 315
    (Tex.Civ.App. 1931, affirmed
    124 T .      ???S.W.2d 1113); Devlin v. Held Bro8., 47
    ~.~.2r383 tTex.Clv.App. 1932; error diam.).
    The election in question is to take place after
    the effective date of Article 32b of the Election Code.
    Further, the filing deadline occurs after the effective date
    of the new law. We believe that It was the intention of the
    Legislature that all election procedures, Including the pay-
    ment of filing fees, be governed by the provisions of the
    new law,. The law is prospective In operation and prescribes
    the entire procedure for elections held after the effective
    date of the act.
    To construe the statute otherwise would attribute
    to the Legislature an intent to allow some candidates to pay
    a fee of five dollars and to require others to pay a fee of
    five hundred dollars.
    In Wood v. State, 
    133 Tex. 110
    , 
    126 S.W.2d 4
            (1939), the Supreme Court of Texas said:
    Honorable P. Frank Lake, page 4 (m-1193)
    "It Is the settled law.that statutes should
    be construed so as to carry out the legislative
    Intent, and when such Intent is,once ascertained,
    it should be given effect, even though literal
    meaning of the words used,therel.nIs not followed.
    Also, statutes should never be given a construc-
    tion that leads to uncertainty, Injustice, or
    confusion, if It Is possible to construe them
    otherwise."
    We therefore hold that all candidates who file,
    regardless of whether they file before or after the effec-
    tive date of the act, must pay the five hundred dollar filing
    fee prescribed In Article 32b of the Election Code.
    SUMMARY
    In the special con ressiona~lelection to be
    held on December 16, 19iii
    1, all candidates who
    file applications to have.their names placed on
    the ballot must,pay the five hundred dollar filing
    fee prescribed In Article 32b of the Election Code,
    regardless of whether they file before or after
    the effective date of the'act.
    Yours very truly,
    WILL WILSON
    Attorney General of Texas
    By:                 &&-4?L
    MKW:afg                               Assistant
    APPROVED:
    OPINION COMMITTEE
    W. V. Geppert, Chairman
    Henry Braswell
    Marvin Thomas
    Fred Werkenthln
    Iola Wilcox
    REVIEWEDFORTHEATTORNEYGENERAL
    BY: Houghton Brownlee
    

Document Info

Docket Number: WW-1193

Judges: Will Wilson

Filed Date: 7/2/1961

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017