Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1941 )


Menu:
  • Hon. John II. Barks,   page 3
    ($1.00) for each correct assessment of land to be sold,
    said fee to be taxed as costs against the delinquent.
    Correct assessment as herein used meana the inventory
    of all properties owned by an individual for any one year.
    Provided, that in no case shall the State or county be
    liable for said fee. . .e
    Article   3891, Vernon’s Annotated Civil Statutes,   provides
    in part:
    ‘The compensations, limitations and maximums
    herein fixed in this Act for officers shall include and
    apply to all officers mentioned herein in each and every
    county of this State, and it is hereby declared to be the
    intention of the Legislature that the provisions of this
    Act shall apply to each of said officers, and any special
    or general law inconaiatent with the provisions hereof
    is hereby upressly    repealed in so far as the same may be
    inconsistent with this Act.
    “The compensation, limitations and maximums herein
    fixed shall also apply to all fees and compensation whatso-
    ever collected by said officers in their official ca.pacity.
    whether accountable as fees of office under the present law,
    and any law, general or special, to the contrary is hereby
    uprcrsiy    repealed. The only kind and character of com-
    pensation exempt from the provisions of this Act shall be
    revards   received by Sheriffs for agprrhension of criminals
    or fugitives from justice and for the recovery of ~tol.en
    property, and moneys received by County Judges and Jus-
    tices of the 2eace for perforhng    marriage ceremonies,
    -. which sum shall not be accountable for and not required to
    be reported as fees of office..
    It appears that the terms of the above quoted statute are
    inclusive to the extent that in order for fees to be exempt there-
    mder,   they must be specifically excluded. Sea the cases of Nichols
    v. Galveston County, 
    228 S.W. 547
    , and Ellis County vs. Thompson,
    
    66 S.W. 49
    .
    In view of the foregoing authoritie8, it is our opinion that
    the above mentioned fee of $1.00 as provided by Article 7331 must
    be accounted for as a fee of office, and that it is mandatory that the
    tax-assessor-collector   collect the said fee of $1.00 for each year
    the taxes are delinquent. See our Opinion No. O-1619, a copy of
    which is enclosed for your convenience.
    L   1
    Hon. John H. Banks, page 4
    Trusting   thst the foregoing   fully answer   your inquiries,
    we are
    Yours   wry   truly
    ATTORNEYGENERALOFTEXAS
    By /a/    Ardell Williams
    Ardell Williams
    Assistant
    AW:N:b
    APPROVED       MAY 31,1941
    ~!s````~nYra
    Attornay General
    APPROVEDOPINION
    COMMITTEE
    BY BWB
    CXAIRMAN
    

Document Info

Docket Number: O-3513

Judges: Gerald Mann

Filed Date: 7/2/1941

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017