Carlos Gonzalez v. the State of Texas ( 2021 )


Menu:
  •                           NUMBER 13-21-00047-CR
    COURT OF APPEALS
    THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
    CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG
    CARLOS GONZALEZ,                                                       Appellant,
    v.
    THE STATE OF TEXAS,                                                      Appellee.
    On appeal from the 214th District Court
    of Nueces County, Texas.
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Longoria and Tijerina
    Memorandum Opinion by Justice Tijerina
    Appellant, Carlos Gonzalez, attempts to appeal the trial court’s overruling of
    defendant’s objection to a polygraph examination. The trial court entered an order on
    January 19, 2021, overruling appellant’s objection to the polygraph examination-as a
    condition of probation.
    On February 8, 2021, the clerk of this court notified appellant it appeared that the
    order from which the appeal was taken was not a final, appealable order, and requested
    the defect be cured within thirty days or the appeal would be dismissed. Appellant failed
    to respond to the Court’s notice.
    Generally, a state appellate court only has jurisdiction to consider an appeal by a
    criminal defendant where there has been a final judgment of conviction. Workman v.
    State, 
    170 Tex. Crim. 621
    , 
    343 S.W.2d 446
    , 447 (1961); McKown v. State, 
    915 S.W.2d 160
    , 161 (Tex. App.–Fort Worth 1996, no pet.). Exceptions to the general rule include: (1)
    certain appeals while on deferred adjudication community supervision, Kirk v. State, 
    942 S.W.2d 624
    , 625 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997); (2) appeals from the denial of a motion to reduce
    bond, Tex. R. App. P. 31.1; McKown, 915 S.W.2d at 161; and (3) certain appeals from
    the denial of habeas corpus relief, Wright v. State, 
    969 S.W.2d 588
    , 589 (Tex. App.--
    Dallas 1998, no pet.); McKown, 915 S.W.2d at 161.
    The Court, having examined and fully considered the notice of appeal, is of the
    opinion that there is not an appealable order and this Court lacks jurisdiction over the
    matters herein. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.
    JAIME TIJERINA
    Justice
    Do not publish.
    TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2 (b).
    Delivered and filed on the
    27th day of May, 2021.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 13-21-00047-CR

Filed Date: 5/27/2021

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 5/31/2021