eLaws | Code of Federal Regulations | United States Code |
 All Courts
 State Courts
 Court of Appeals of Texas
 2017-07

in the Matter of S.O.W. ( 2017 )


Menu:
 
  •                                 Fourth Court of Appeals
San Antonio, Texas
MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04-17-00067-CV
IN THE MATTER OF S.O.W.
From the 386th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas
Trial Court No. 1994-JUV-02115 W1
Honorable Laura Parker, Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM
Sitting:          Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice
Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
Delivered and Filed: July 19, 2017
DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION
Appellant was a juvenile who was certified to be tried as an adult for capital murder. See
TEX. FAM. CODE ANN. § 54.02 (West 2014). Appellant was convicted of capital murder and
sentenced to life imprisonment on November 12, 1996. Appellant appealed his conviction and
this court affirmed the trial court’s judgment in an opinion issued on May 20, 1998. See Williams
v. State,
    974 S.W.2d 324 
    (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1998, pet. ref’d), cert. denied,
    528 U.S. 908 
    (1999).
Appellant, proceeding pro se, seeks to appeal the trial court’s denial of his post-conviction
application for writ of habeas corpus. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 11.07 (West 2015).
Only the Court of Criminal Appeals has authority to grant post-conviction release from
confinement for persons with a final felony conviction. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 11.07,
04-17-00067-CV
§§ 3, 5; Hoang v. State,
    872 S.W.2d 694
    , 697 (Tex. Crim. App. 1993); In re Stone,
    26 S.W.3d 568
    ,
569 (Tex. App.—Waco 2000, no pet.) (per curiam) (mem. op.). This Court has no jurisdiction
over an appeal from the trial court’s denial of a post-conviction petition for habeas corpus relief in
a felony case. Board of Pardons & Paroles ex rel. Keene v. Court of Appeals for the Eighth
District,
    910 S.W.2d 481
    , 483 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995); see In re Coronado,
    980 S.W.2d 691
    , 692
(Tex. App.—San Antonio 1998, no pet.). While the procedures outlined in article 11.07 do not
apply to dispositions in juvenile proceedings, here S.O.W.’s application for habeas corpus relief
arises from his conviction in a criminal district court where he was certified to stand trial as an
adult. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 11.07; Ex parte Lauderdale, No. 04-17-00063-CV,
    2017 WL 1161171
    , at *1 (Tex. App.—San Antonio Mar. 29, 2017, no pet.) (per curiam) (mem.
op.). Criminal proceedings against a juvenile certified to stand trial as an adult are governed by
the Code of Criminal Procedure, and post-conviction habeas proceedings are included. See TEX.
FAM. CODE ANN. § 54.02(h) (West 2014); Ex parte Lauderdale,
    2017 WL 1161171
    , at *1.
Accordingly, we ordered appellant to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed
for want of jurisdiction. Appellant did not respond. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed for want
of jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a); see also Ex parte Lauderdale,
    2017 WL 1161171
    , at
*1.
PER CURIAM
-2-