-
NUMBER 13-20-00180-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG IN THE INTEREST OF A.G., A CHILD. On appeal from the County Court at Law of Aransas County, Texas. MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Benavides, Hinojosa, and Silva Memorandum Opinion by Justice Hinojosa Appellant Paul Carver Griffith filed a notice of appeal from a protective order signed on March 4, 2020, in trial court cause number A-20-7016-FL in the County Court at Law of Aransas County, Texas. The clerk’s record for the appeal was filed on May 5, 2020, and a supplemental clerk’s record was subsequently filed on December 3, 2020. On January 7, 2021, after appellant failed to obtain a reporter’s record, the Clerk of this Court notified appellant that his appeal would be submitted on the clerk’s records and his brief was due to be filed on or before February 8, 2021. Appellant did not timely file a brief or otherwise respond to the Court’s notice. On March 3, 2021, the Clerk of this Court notified appellant that his brief had not been timely filed. The Clerk of this Court advised appellant that the appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution unless, within ten days from the date of this letter, appellant reasonably explained the failure and the appellee was not significantly injured by the appellant’s failure to timely file a brief. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a). Appellant did not respond to the Clerk’s notice or file a brief in this matter. Appellate courts possess the authority to dismiss an appeal for want of prosecution when an appellant in a civil case fails to timely file the appellant’s brief and gives no reasonable explanation for the failure. See id. R. 38.8(a)(1); id. R. 42.3(b); Am. Bail Bonds v. City of El Paso,
225 S.W.3d 612, 612 (Tex. App.—El Paso 2006, no pet.); Newman v. Clark,
113 S.W.3d 622, 623 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2003, no pet.) (per curiam). Similarly, courts may dismiss an appeal for want of prosecution generally or because the appellant has failed to comply with a requirement of the appellate rules, a court order, or a notice from the appellate court clerk requiring a response or other action within a specified time. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3 (b), (c). The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file and appellant’s failure to file a brief, is of the opinion that this appeal should be dismissed. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See
id.R. 38.8(a), 42.3(b), (c). 2 LETICIA HINOJOSA Justice Delivered and filed on the 3rd day of June, 2021. 3
Document Info
Docket Number: 13-20-00180-CV
Filed Date: 6/3/2021
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 6/7/2021