in the Interest of A.G., a Child ( 2021 )


Menu:
  •                           NUMBER 13-20-00180-CV
    COURT OF APPEALS
    THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
    CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG
    IN THE INTEREST OF A.G., A CHILD.
    On appeal from the County Court at Law
    of Aransas County, Texas.
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    Before Justices Benavides, Hinojosa, and Silva
    Memorandum Opinion by Justice Hinojosa
    Appellant Paul Carver Griffith filed a notice of appeal from a protective order signed
    on March 4, 2020, in trial court cause number A-20-7016-FL in the County Court at Law
    of Aransas County, Texas. The clerk’s record for the appeal was filed on May 5, 2020,
    and a supplemental clerk’s record was subsequently filed on December 3, 2020.
    On January 7, 2021, after appellant failed to obtain a reporter’s record, the Clerk
    of this Court notified appellant that his appeal would be submitted on the clerk’s records
    and his brief was due to be filed on or before February 8, 2021. Appellant did not timely
    file a brief or otherwise respond to the Court’s notice.
    On March 3, 2021, the Clerk of this Court notified appellant that his brief had not
    been timely filed. The Clerk of this Court advised appellant that the appeal would be
    dismissed for want of prosecution unless, within ten days from the date of this letter,
    appellant reasonably explained the failure and the appellee was not significantly injured
    by the appellant’s failure to timely file a brief. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a). Appellant did
    not respond to the Clerk’s notice or file a brief in this matter.
    Appellate courts possess the authority to dismiss an appeal for want of prosecution
    when an appellant in a civil case fails to timely file the appellant’s brief and gives no
    reasonable explanation for the failure. See id. R. 38.8(a)(1); id. R. 42.3(b); Am. Bail Bonds
    v. City of El Paso, 
    225 S.W.3d 612
    , 612 (Tex. App.—El Paso 2006, no pet.); Newman v.
    Clark, 
    113 S.W.3d 622
    , 623 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2003, no pet.) (per curiam). Similarly,
    courts may dismiss an appeal for want of prosecution generally or because the appellant
    has failed to comply with a requirement of the appellate rules, a court order, or a notice
    from the appellate court clerk requiring a response or other action within a specified time.
    See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3 (b), (c).
    The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file and
    appellant’s failure to file a brief, is of the opinion that this appeal should be dismissed.
    Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See 
    id.
     R. 38.8(a), 42.3(b),
    (c).
    2
    LETICIA HINOJOSA
    Justice
    Delivered and filed on the
    3rd day of June, 2021.
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 13-20-00180-CV

Filed Date: 6/3/2021

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 6/7/2021