Herbert Lawrence Polinard Jr. and Irene C. Polinard v. James Paul Tisdel Jr. ( 2021 )


Menu:
  •                                    Fourth Court of Appeals
    San Antonio, Texas
    June 1, 2021
    No. 04-21-00135-CV
    Herbert Lawrence POLINARD Jr. and Irene C. Polinard,
    Appellants
    v.
    James Paul TISDEL Jr.,
    Appellee
    From the 224th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas
    Trial Court No. 2017-CI-04746
    Honorable Mary Lou Alvarez, Judge Presiding
    ORDER
    The trial court rendered a final summary judgment against appellants, Herbert Lawrence
    Polinard Jr. and Irene G. Polinard, on November 25, 2020. The Polinards filed a timely motion
    for new trial. The motion was overruled by operation of law on February 8, 2021. Tex. R. Civ. P.
    329b(c). The Polinards then filed a motion for reconsideration that was set for hearing on March
    9, 2021, one day before the trial court’s plenary power was to expire. See 
    id. 329
    b(e). At that
    hearing, appellant argued the trial court had plenary power to reconsider his arguments and grant
    a new trial. The Judge’s Notes, dated March 9 and March 10, state the trial court granted the
    motion for reconsideration and denied the motion for new trial.1 The court did not vacate,
    modify, correct, or reform the November 25, 2020 judgment. On April 8, 2021, the Polinards
    filed a notice of appeal, stating their intent to appeal “the District Court’s March 10, 2021,
    Order/Judgment which, inter alia, denied PLAINTIFFS’ Motion for New Trial and, through
    which, thereby, affirmed a November 25, 2020 summary judgment by default resulting in the
    subsequent dismissal of PLAINTIFFS’ claims in this matter.” The record has been filed and
    raises an issue regarding our jurisdiction over the appeal.
    The Polinards’ timely filed motion for new trial extended the deadline to appeal the
    November 25, 2020, judgment until February 23, 2021, ninety days after the judgment was
    signed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1(a). Because the trial court did not modify, correct, or reform the
    November judgment, the timetable for appealing the judgment was not restarted. See TEX. R.
    1
    The record does not contain signed written orders.
    CIV. P. 329b(h). The trial court’s order denying the motion for new trial after reconsideration
    (even if written and signed) is not an independently appealable order and did not further extend
    the deadline to appeal or start a new timetable to perfect an appeal from the November judgment.
    See Morris v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., No. 01-19-00610-CV, 
    2019 WL 4677365
    , at *1 (Tex.
    App.—Houston [1st Dist.] Sept. 26, 2019, no pet.) (mem. op.); State Office of Risk Mgmt. v.
    Berdan, 
    335 S.W.3d 421
    , 428 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi 2011, pet. denied).
    Thus, the notice of appeal was due February 23, 2021, or a motion for extension of time
    to file the notice of appeal was due fifteen days later on March 10. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1,
    26.3. The Polinards did not file a motion for extension of time to file the notice of appeal and did
    not file their notice of appeal until April 8, 2021. A timely notice of appeal must be filed in order
    to invoke this court’s jurisdiction. See Sweed v. Nye, 
    323 S.W.3d 873
     (Tex. 2010 ). “Once the
    period for granting a motion for extension of time under Rule [26.3] has passed, a party can no
    longer invoke the appellate court’s jurisdiction.” See Verburgt v. Dorner, 
    959 S.W.2d 615
    , 615
    (1997).
    We therefore order a response due by June 21, 2021, showing cause why this appeal
    should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. If appellants fail to satisfactorily respond within
    the time provided, the appeal will be dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a), (c). Appellants have
    the burden to request the trial court clerk prepare a supplemental clerk’s record containing any
    pleadings and orders necessary to establish this court’s jurisdiction. Appellants must file a copy
    of any such request with this court.
    All deadlines in this matter are suspended until further order of the court.
    _________________________________
    Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
    IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said
    court on this 1st day of June, 2021.
    ___________________________________
    Michael A. Cruz,
    Clerk of Court
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 04-21-00135-CV

Filed Date: 6/1/2021

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 6/8/2021