Isaac Cardenas v. the State of Texas ( 2021 )


Menu:
  •                              Fourth Court of Appeals
    San Antonio, Texas
    June 10, 2021
    No. 04-21-00098-CR
    Isaac CARDENAS,
    Appellant
    v.
    THE STATE OF TEXAS,
    Appellee
    From the 227th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas
    Trial Court No. 2017CR10269
    Honorable Kevin M. O'Connell, Judge Presiding
    ORDER
    Appellant’s court-appointed attorney has filed a brief and motion to withdraw pursuant
    to Anders v. California, 
    386 U.S. 738
     (1967), in which he asserts there are no meritorious issues
    to raise on appeal. Counsel certifies he has served copies of the brief and motion on
    appellant, and has informed appellant of his right to review the record and file his own brief, and
    has explained to appellant the procedure for obtaining the record. See Nichols v. State, 
    954 S.W.2d 83
    , 85 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1997, no pet.); Bruns v. State, 
    924 S.W.2d 176
    , 177 n.1
    (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1996, no pet.). Counsel also provided appellant with a pro se motion
    for access to the appellate record.
    Appellant may obtain a copy of the appellate record by filing a written request, not
    later than June 24, 2021, with the clerk of the trial court, Mary Angie Garcia, District
    Clerk, Paul Elizondo Tower, 101 W Nueva, Suite 217., San Antonio, TX 78205-3411, 210-
    335-2113. If appellant files a written request for the record with the trial court clerk, Mary
    Angie Garcia is ORDERED to immediately send a copy of the record to appellant.
    .
    If appellant desires to file a pro se brief, he must do so within forty-five days from the
    date of this order. See Bruns, 924 S.W.2d at 177 n.1.
    If appellant files a timely pro se brief, the State may file a responsive brief no later than
    thirty days after appellant’s pro se brief is filed in this court. Alternatively, if appellant does not
    file a timely pro se brief, the State may file a brief in response to counsel’s brief no later
    than thirty days after the pro se brief is due.
    We further ORDER the motion to withdraw filed by appellant’s counsel to be HELD IN
    ABEYANCE pending further order of the court. See Penson v. Ohio, 
    488 U.S. 75
    , 80-82
    (1988); Schulman v. State, 
    252 S.W.3d 403
    , 410-11 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008).
    We further ORDER the Clerk of this Court to serve a copy of this order on appellant, his
    counsel, the attorney for the State, and the clerk of the trial court.
    _________________________________
    Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice
    IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said
    court on this 10th day of June, 2021.
    ___________________________________
    MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 04-21-00098-CR

Filed Date: 6/10/2021

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 6/15/2021