Arthur Bouier v. Jeff 1, LLC ( 2021 )


Menu:
  •                                 Fourth Court of Appeals
    San Antonio, Texas
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    No. 04-21-00145-CV
    Arthur BOUIER,
    Appellant
    v.
    JEFF 1, LLC,
    Appellee
    From the 408th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas
    Trial Court No. 2020-CI-00448
    Honorable Laura Salinas, Judge Presiding
    PER CURIAM
    Sitting:          Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
    Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
    Irene Rios, Justice
    Delivered and Filed: June 9, 2021
    DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION
    In this appeal of a judgment from a trespass-to-try title case, Appellant filed his brief on
    May 7, 2021, but Appellant’s brief did not comply with Rule 38.1 of the Texas Rules of Appellate
    Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.1. On May 13, 2021, we advised Appellant that his brief had
    the following defects:
    •   the Statement of the Case is just over two pages long, discusses the facts, and includes
    arguments, contra id. R. 38.1(d);
    •   the Statement of Facts refers to numerous documents, but it has only one citation to the
    clerk’s record, and it refers to several documents or authorities that appear to be outside
    the appellate record, contra id. R. 38.1(g); Greystar, LLC v. Adams, 
    426 S.W.3d 861
    ,
    04-21-00145-CV
    865 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2014, no pet.) (“[A]n appellate court may not consider matters
    outside the record . . . .”);
    •   the Argument section contains no citations to the record, contra 
    id.
     R. 38.1(i);
    •   there is no Appendix, contra 
    id.
     R. 38.1(k); and
    •   the Certificate of Compliance omits the required word count, contra 
    id.
     R. 9.4(i)(3).
    In our May 13, 2021 order, we struck Appellant’s brief and ordered Appellant to file an
    amended brief by May 24, 2021. We advised Appellant that the amended brief must correct all
    the violations listed above and fully comply with the applicable rules. See, e.g., 
    id.
     R. 9.4, 9.5,
    38.1. We warned Appellant that if the amended brief did not comply with our order, we “may
    strike the brief, prohibit [Appellant] from filing another, and proceed as if [Appellant] had failed
    to file a brief.” See 
    id.
     R. 38.9(a); see also 
    id.
     R. 38.8(a) (authorizing this court to dismiss an appeal
    if an appellant fails to timely file a brief).
    Appellant has not filed a response to our May 13, 2021 order. Therefore, we dismiss this
    appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.4, 38.8(a)(1), 38.9(a), 42.3(b),(c).
    PER CURIAM
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 04-21-00145-CV

Filed Date: 6/9/2021

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 6/15/2021