in Re Commitment of John Graves ( 2017 )


Menu:
  • In The
    Court of Appeals
    Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
    ____________________
    NO. 09-17-00287-CV
    ____________________
    IN RE COMMITMENT OF JOHN GRAVES
    ________________________________________________________________________
    On Appeal from the 435th District Court
    Montgomery County, Texas
    Trial Cause No. 12-05-05201-CV
    ________________________________________________________________________
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    John Graves was civilly committed in 2012. See generally In re Commitment
    of Graves, No. 09-13-00141-CV, 
    2013 WL 6705980
    , at *1 (Tex. App.—Beaumont
    Dec. 19, 2013, pet. denied) (mem. op.). On June 15, 2017, the trial court signed a
    biennial review order that continued the previous order of civil commitment without
    modification. Graves filed a notice of appeal. We questioned our jurisdiction and
    asked the parties to file responses regarding whether the appeal was frivolous. The
    State filed responses but no response has been filed by Graves.
    1
    A biennial review order continuing a person’s civil commitment is not an
    appealable order. See In re Commitment of Richards, 
    395 S.W.3d 905
    , 908–10 (Tex.
    App.—Beaumont 2013, pet. denied). Graves has not identified an order that is
    appealable at this time.
    “To determine whether an appeal is objectively frivolous, we review the
    record from the viewpoint of the advocate and decide whether the advocate had
    reasonable grounds to believe the case could be reversed.” Glassman v. Goodfriend,
    
    347 S.W.3d 772
    , 782 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2011, pet. denied). Graves
    has not presented any authority contrary to Richards nor has he presented any
    argument that Richards was wrongly decided and should be overruled. We conclude
    that the appeal is frivolous. See Tex. R. App. P. 45. In the event Graves files a
    frivolous appeal with this Court in the future, the Court will consider imposing
    sanctions. See id.
    The appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a);
    43.2(f).
    APPEAL DISMISSED.
    ________________________________
    CHARLES KREGER
    Justice
    2
    Submitted on September 27, 2017
    Opinion Delivered September 28, 2017
    Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Johnson, JJ.
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 09-17-00287-CV

Filed Date: 9/28/2017

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/2/2017