in Re Norman Yoes ( 2022 )

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-22-00041-CV
In re Norman Yoes
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM BANDERA COUNTY
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Relator Norman Wade Yoes, an inmate in the Texas Department of Criminal
Justice, filed a pro se petition for writ of mandamus. See Tex. Gov’t Code § 22.221; see also
Tex. R. App. P. 52.1. Relator complains that the Bandera County district court has failed to rule
on his attorneys’ motion to withdraw.
As an intermediate appellate court, we may issue writs of mandamus against a
district judge or county judge only sitting in our district, or to enforce our jurisdiction. See
Tex. Gov’t Code § 22.221. We lack jurisdiction to issue the requested writ against the
respondent, listed as the 198th District Court of Bandera County, because this Court neither has
jurisdiction over the district courts of Bandera County nor is such a writ necessary to enforce this
Court's appellate jurisdiction. See Tex. Gov't Code § 22.221(a), (b)(1); see also Tex. Gov’t Code
§ 22.201(d) (listing the counties composing the Third Court of Appeal District). The Fourth
Court of Appeals in San Antonio has jurisdiction over Bandera County district courts. See
Tex. Gov’t Code § 22.201(e), 22.205(a). Accordingly, we dismiss Relator’s petition for want
of jurisdiction.
Relator also presented a motion for leave to file his petition for writ of mandamus.
Leave is not required to file a petition for writ of mandamus in the court of appeals, but only in
the Court of Criminal Appeals. See Tex. R. App. P. 52 Notes and Comments, 72.1. Relator’s
motion for leave to file a writ of mandamus is dismissed as moot.
__________________________________________
Darlene Byrne, Chief Justice
Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Kelly and Smith
Filed: February 1, 2022
2