David Cornett v. the State of Texas ( 2022 )

IN THE
TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10-22-00124-CR
No. 10-22-00125-CR
No. 10-22-00126-CR
No. 10-22-00127-CR
No. 10-22-00128-CR
No. 10-22-00129-CR
No. 10-22-00130-CR
No. 10-22-00131-CR
No. 10-22-00132-CR
No. 10-22-00133-CR
No. 10-22-00134-CR
No. 10-22-00135-CR
No. 10-22-00136-CR
DAVID CORNETT,
Appellant
v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS,
Appellee
From the 40th District Court
Ellis County, Texas
Trial Court Nos. 37235CR, 37236CR, 37237CR, 37238CR,
37239CR, 37240CR, 37241CR, 37242CR, 37243CR,
37244CR, 37245CR, 37246CR, and 37247CR
MEMORANDUM OPINION
David Cornett appeals the trial court's denial of Cornett's "Motion for Nunc Pro
Tunc Order to Remove the Improper Cumulation Order and Illegal Sentence in Cause
No. 37235-37247CR."
We do not have appellate jurisdiction of the denial of a motion for judgment nunc
pro tunc. Everett v. State, 82 S.W.3d 735 (Tex. App.—Waco 2002, pet. dism'd). The
appropriate remedy to obtain review of the denial of a nunc pro tunc motion is by a
petition for writ of mandamus. Ex parte Forooghi, 185 S.W.3d 498 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006)
(Johnson, J., concurring statement); see also Ex parte Ybarra, 149 S.W.3d 147, 149 (Tex. Crim.
App. 2004).
Accordingly, we dismiss these appeals for want of jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP. P.
43.2(f).
TOM GRAY
Chief Justice
Before Chief Justice Gray,
Justice Johnson, and
Justice Smith
Appeals dismissed
Opinion delivered and filed May 11, 2022
Do not publish
[CRPM]
Cornett v. State Page 2