David Wayne Black v. the State of Texas ( 2022 )


Menu:
  •              In the
    Court of Appeals
    Second Appellate District of Texas
    at Fort Worth
    ___________________________
    No. 02-21-00145-CR
    ___________________________
    DAVID WAYNE BLACK, Appellant
    V.
    THE STATE OF TEXAS
    On Appeal from Criminal District Court No. 4
    Tarrant County, Texas
    Trial Court No. 0976642R
    Before Sudderth, C.J.; Kerr and Walker, JJ.
    Memorandum Opinion by Justice Walker
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    Appellant David Wayne Black attempts to appeal his convictions for two
    counts of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon and one count of violation of a
    protective order. Although the trial court imposed his sentences on October 5, 2005,
    making any notice of appeal due November 4, 2005, he filed a notice of out-of-time
    appeal on October 20, 2021, seeking an extension to appeal and arguing that he may
    collaterally attack his convictions because the sentences are void. See Tex. R. App. P.
    26.2(a), 26.3. We notified Black that we questioned our jurisdiction over his appeal
    given that his notice of appeal and extension request were filed sixteen years after his
    sentences had been imposed. See Tex. R. App. P. 44.3. Black responded but other
    than reasserting his need for an extension, he has not further addressed our
    jurisdiction.
    If a notice of appeal is not timely filed, we have no choice but to dismiss the
    appeal for want of jurisdiction. Castillo v. State, 
    369 S.W.3d 196
    , 198 (Tex. Crim. App.
    2012) (citing Olivo v. State, 
    918 S.W.2d 519
    , 523 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996)); cf. Mizell v.
    State, 
    119 S.W.3d 804
    , 806 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003) (holding trial or appellate court
    may correct illegal sentence if the court “otherwise has jurisdiction” over the
    conviction). Black’s exclusive remedy at this point is by way of a post-conviction writ
    of habeas corpus, not a direct appeal. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 11.07, § 3;
    see also id. § 5 (providing that after final conviction, habeas corpus procedure is
    2
    “exclusive”). Thus, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App.
    P. 43.2(f).
    /s/ Brian Walker
    Brian Walker
    Justice
    Do Not Publish
    Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)
    Delivered: February 3, 2022
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 02-21-00145-CR

Filed Date: 2/3/2022

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/7/2022