in Re Patrick Earl Tarkington ( 2022 )

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-22-00039-CV
In re Patrick Earl Tarkington
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM COMAL COUNTY
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Relator has filed a petition for writ of mandamus complaining of the trial court’s
failure to rule on his motion to withdraw his attorney. Having reviewed the petition and the
record provided, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a); see
also Tex. R. App. P. 52.7(a); In re Smith, No. 03-14-00478-CV, 2014 WL 4079922, at *2 (Tex.
App.—Austin Aug. 13, 2014, orig. proceeding) (denying mandamus relief when relator failed to
provide sufficient record from which to evaluate claim for mandamus relief); In re Halley,
No. 03-15-00310-CV, 2015 WL 4448831, at *2 (Tex. App.—Austin July 14, 2015) (orig.
proceeding) (concluding that a six-month delay did not constitute an unreasonable length of time
under “failure to rule” analysis).
__________________________________________
Edward Smith, Justice
Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Kelly and Smith
Filed: February 11, 2022
2