Netflix, Inc. Netflix Worldwide Entertainment, LLC Kyoko Miyake Sarit G. Work Samantha Knowles Kate Gill Jigsaw Productions, LLC Muddy Waters Productions LLC Alex Gibney Philip Ross Jo Ann Rivera Laura A. Martinez Brittany A. Martinez Michelle C. Martinez And Jose H. Martinez v. Tonya Barina ( 2022 )

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas February 15, 2022 No. 04-21-00327-CV NETFLIX, INC.; Netflix Worldwide Entertainment, LLC; Kyoko Miyake; Sarit G. Work; Samantha Knowles; Kate Gill; Jigsaw Productions, LLC; Muddy Waters Productions LLC; Alex Gibney; Philip Ross; Jo Ann Rivera; Laura A. Martinez; Brittany A. Martinez; Michelle C. Martinez; and Jose H. Martinez, Appellants v. Tonya BARINA, Appellee From the 285th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2021CI04501 Honorable Cathleen M. Stryker, Judge Presiding ORDER On January 27, 2022, we set this cause for submission by oral argument on February 24, 2022. Because of intervening scheduling conflicts, we withdraw our February 24, 2022 submission date. We set this cause for submission by oral argument on Thursday, March 24, 2022, at 9:00 a.m., before a panel consisting of Justice Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice Irene Rios, and Justice Beth Watkins. Oral argument will be held virtually via the Fourth Court of Appeals’ Zoom license. Counsel will receive a separate e-mail that will contain a link for the oral argument. Counsel are admonished as follows: 1. The link to Zoom is only for counsel presenting argument and is not to be shared with any other person. Counsel will need a computer or other electronic device with a camera, a microphone, and access to the Internet. If counsel intends to present any exhibits during oral argument, any such exhibits must be electronically filed by noon on the day before argument. 2. The argument will be live streamed to the Court’s YouTube channel for the benefit of the public. The argument can be accessed using the following link: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCiaWJQ7eW5OQIALdyLN6s3A 3. Counsel are encouraged to familiarize themselves with the Zoom platform. The Clerk of the Court will contact counsel no later than the week before argument to verify connectivity and equipment. 4. Counsel must wear court-appropriate attire and choose an appropriate background. 5. The time for oral argument will be allotted as follows: Appellant’s opening argument 20 Appellee’s response 20 Appellant’s rebuttal 10 See 4TH TEX. APP. (SAN ANTONIO) LOC. R. 9.1. If a participant’s link is disconnected during argument, timing of the argument will stop until the participant is able to reconnect. Entered on this 15th day of February, 2022. PER CURIAM ATTESTED TO: ________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court