in the Interest of O.L.P., a Child ( 2022 )

Fourth Court of Appeals
San Antonio, Texas
MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04-21-00539-CV
IN THE INTEREST OF O.L.P., a Child
From the 166th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas
Trial Court No. 2020-PA-01347
Honorable Laura Salinas, Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Irene Rios, Justice
Beth Watkins, Justice
Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice
Delivered and Filed: February 16, 2022
DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION
On September 29, 2020, the trial court signed a judgment terminating appellant’s parental
rights to O.L.P. Therefore, appellant’s notice of appeal was due to be filed on October 19, 2020.
See TEX. R. APP. P. 28.4(a)(1) (stating appeals in parental termination cases are governed by the
rules of appellate procedure for accelerated appeals); 26.1(b) (stating in an accelerated appeal the
notice of appeal must be filed within twenty days after the judgment is signed). A motion for
extension of time to file a notice of appeal was due on November 3, 2020. See id. 26.3. Appellant
did not file her notice of appeal until December 9, 2021.
“A timely notice of appeal is necessary to invoke this court’s jurisdiction.” In re L.R.S.,
No. 04-20-00507-CV, 2020 WL 7365444, at *1 (Tex. App.—San Antonio Dec. 16, 2020, no pet.)
(per curiam) (mem. op). A motion for extension of time is necessarily implied when an appellant,
04-21-00539-CV
acting in good faith, files a notice of appeal beyond the time allowed by Rule 26.1 but within the
fifteen-day grace period provided by Rule 26.3 for filing a motion for extension of time. See
Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997) (construing predecessor to Rule 26). But
“once the period for granting a motion for extension of time under Rule [26.3] has passed, a party
can no longer invoke the appellate court’s jurisdiction.” Id.On December 30, 2021, this court issued an order directing appellant to show cause in
writing on or before January 12, 2022, why this appeal should not be dismissed for want of
jurisdiction. We suspended all appellate deadlines pending our determination of whether we have
jurisdiction over this appeal. On January 6, 2022, appellant filed a motion requesting a sixty-day
extension of time in which to file her appellant’s brief. Appellant has not responded to our
December 30 show cause order. Because appellant’s notice of appeal was not timely filed, we are
required to dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction.
Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. We deny appellant’s motion
for extension of time to file her brief as moot.
PER CURIAM
-2-