in Re: Chuan Chen and M. Tayari Garrett ( 2022 )


Menu:
  • Deny and Opinion Filed February 25, 2022
    In The
    Court of Appeals
    Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
    No. 05-22-00140-CV
    IN RE CHUAN CHEN AND M. TAYARI GARRETT, Relators
    Original Proceeding from the 192nd Judicial District Court
    Dallas County, Texas
    Trial Court Cause No. DC-21-17249
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    Before Justices Molberg, Pedersen, III, and Garcia
    Opinion by Justice Pedersen, III
    Before the Court are relators’ February 22, 2022 petition for writ of
    mandamus and motion for emergency stay.
    Entitlement to mandamus relief requires relators to show that the trial court
    clearly abused its discretion and that they lack an adequate appellate remedy. In re
    Prudential Ins. Co., 
    148 S.W.3d 124
    , 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding).
    Based on our review of the petition and record, we conclude relators have
    failed to demonstrate an entitlement to mandamus relief. Accordingly, we deny the
    petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).
    We deny relators’ motion for emergency stay as moot.
    Page 1 of 2
    220140f.p05     /Bill Pedersen, III//
    BILL PEDERSEN, III
    JUSTICE
    –2–
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 05-22-00140-CV

Filed Date: 2/25/2022

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 3/2/2022