in Re: James T. Daniel and Kristi A. Daniel ( 2022 )


Menu:
  • Deny and Opinion Filed February 23, 2022
    In The
    Court of Appeals
    Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
    No. 05-22-00114-CV
    IN RE JAMES T. DANIEL AND KRISTI A. DANIEL, Relators
    Original Proceeding from the 380th Judicial District Court
    Collin County, Texas
    Trial Court Cause No. 380-52305-2021
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    Before Justices Molberg, Pedersen, III, and Garcia
    Opinion by Justice Pedersen, III
    Before the Court is relators’ February 11, 2022 petition for writ of mandamus
    in which they challenge the trial court’s temporary order changing the conservator
    with the exclusive right to determine the children’s primary residence. Entitlement
    to mandamus relief requires relators to show that the trial court clearly abused its
    discretion and that they lack an adequate appellate remedy. In re Prudential Ins. Co.,
    
    148 S.W.3d 124
    , 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding).
    Based on our review of the petition, real party in interest’s response, and the
    record, we conclude that relators have failed to show their entitlement to the relief
    requested. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ
    of mandamus.
    220114f.p05     /Bill Pedersen, III/
    BILL PEDERSEN, III
    JUSTICE
    –2–
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 05-22-00114-CV

Filed Date: 2/23/2022

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 3/2/2022