Brandy Brenay Charles and Ronald Dwayne Whitfield v. Texas Department of Family and Protective Services ( 2022 )


Menu:
  •                                 COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE
    FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON
    ORDER
    Appellate case name:        B.B.C. and R.D.W. v. Texas Department of Family and
    Protective Services
    Appellate case number:      01-18-00311-CV
    Trial court case number:    2017-02559J
    Trial court:                314th District Court of Harris County
    On May 8, 2018, the Court granted the motion to dismiss appeal filed by appellants,
    B.B.C. and R.D.W. The Court’s judgment also issued May 8, 2018. Appellants filed a
    motion for rehearing and motion for en banc reconsideration of the Court’s May 8, 2018
    opinion, both of which were dismissed as moot on August 18, 2018.
    Intermediate appellate courts, such as this Court, retain plenary power over an
    appeal for a period of: (1) sixty days after its judgment is entered if no timely filed motion
    for rehearing or motion for en banc reconsideration is filed, or (2) thirty days after the
    appellate court overrules all timely filed motions for rehearing or motions for en banc
    reconsideration. See TEX. R. APP. P. 19.1. Generally, once an intermediate appellate
    court’s plenary power expires, it lacks jurisdiction to take any action in an appeal. See
    Nunu v. Risk, 
    612 S.W.3d 645
    , 655 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2020, pet. denied)
    (dismissing appeal for lack of jurisdiction where plenary power of intermediate appellate
    court expired).
    Once an intermediate appellate court’s plenary power expires, the appellate court’s
    jurisdiction is limited to only those actions as prescribed in rule 19.3 of the Texas Rules of
    Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 19.3. As noted above, the Court issued the
    judgment in this appeal on May 8, 2018 and appellants’ motion for rehearing and motion
    for en banc reconsideration were dismissed as moot by the Court on August 18, 2018.
    Accordingly, the Court’s plenary power over this appeal expired on September 17, 2018.
    See TEX. R. APP. P. 19.1(b).
    On February 25, 2022, B.B.C. and R.D.W. jointly presented to the Court “Motions
    to Recall Mandates” in this appellate cause number, as well as appellate cause number
    01-18-00485-CV.
    As analyzed above, and as appellants were advised in our April 9, 2019 order on
    their motions for stay and recall of mandates, this Court’s plenary power expired on
    September 17, 2018. After the Court’s plenary power expires, this Court has no jurisdiction
    to take any action on a case unless expressly authorized by the Texas Rules of Appellate
    Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 19.3(a)-(d). Notably, none of the permitted post-plenary
    power bases set forth in rule 19.3 apply here.
    Absent plenary power, appellants’ motion must be dismissed for lack of
    jurisdiction.
    It is so ORDERED.
    Judge’s signature: _____/s/ Amparo Guerra_____
     Acting individually  Acting for the Court
    Date: ___March 3, 2022____
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 01-18-00311-CV

Filed Date: 3/3/2022

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 3/7/2022