Kevin Lamar Johnson v. State ( 2018 )


Menu:
  •                               Fourth Court of Appeals
    San Antonio, Texas
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    No. 04-17-00750-CR
    Kevin Lamar JOHNSON,
    Appellant
    v.
    The STATE of Texas,
    Appellee
    From the 227th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas
    Trial Court No. 2002CR4779
    Honorable Philip A. Kazen Jr., Judge Presiding
    PER CURIAM
    Sitting:          Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
    Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
    Irene Rios, Justice
    Delivered and Filed: January 31, 2018
    DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION
    In the matter underlying this appeal, Appellant Kevin Lamar Johnson was convicted of
    aggravated robbery and, on November 6, 2002, he was sentenced to life imprisonment. In 2015,
    Appellant filed a motion for DNA testing, he appeared at the hearing, and the trial court denied his
    motion on August 14, 2015. More than two years later, Appellant filed a notice of appeal.
    Because Appellant’s notice of appeal was not timely filed, and his untimely notice of
    appeal did not invoke this court’s jurisdiction, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction.
    04-17-00750-CR
    BACKGROUND
    On July 24, 2002, Appellant was indicted for aggravated robbery of an elderly person
    causing bodily injury. Appellant was tried by jury and convicted of aggravated robbery (repeater)
    on November 6, 2002, was fined $10,000.00, and was sentenced to imprisonment for life in the
    Texas Department of Criminal Justice—Institutional Division.
    On June 5, 2015, at Appellant’s request, the trial court appointed counsel to represent
    Appellant in his DNA motion, and counsel filed a motion. Counsel and Appellant appeared in
    person at the hearing on the motion—and the trial court denied the motion in open court on August
    14, 2015. Appellant did not file a motion to reconsider the order, a motion for new trial, or any
    other post-decision pleading pertaining to the trial court’s August 14, 2015 order—until Appellant
    filed a notice of appeal on November 9, 2017. Appellant’s court-appointed appellate counsel
    concedes Appellant’s notice of appeal was not timely.
    LATE NOTICE OF APPEAL
    A timely notice of appeal is necessary to invoke a court of appeals’ jurisdiction. Olivo v.
    State, 
    918 S.W.2d 519
    , 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). Appellant’s notice of appeal was due on
    September 14, 2015, see TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2, or his notice of appeal and a motion for extension
    of time to file the notice of appeal were due not later than September 28, 2015, see 
    id. R. 26.3.
    Appellant’s November 9, 2017 notice of appeal was not timely filed and did not invoke
    this court’s appellate jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a); 
    Olivo, 918 S.W.2d at 522
    . We
    dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. See 
    Olivo, 918 S.W.2d at 522
    ; see also Ater v. Eighth
    Court of Appeals, 
    802 S.W.2d 241
    , 243 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991).
    -2-
    04-17-00750-CR
    Appellant’s January 4, 2018 pro se motion to represent himself in this appeal is moot.
    Because we lack jurisdiction, we do not consider Appellant’s January 17, 2018 pro se brief.
    PER CURIAM
    DO NOT PUBLISH
    -3-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 04-17-00750-CR

Filed Date: 1/31/2018

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/7/2018