Tom Rosales Hernandez v. State ( 2013 )


Menu:
  •                               Fourth Court of Appeals
    San Antonio, Texas
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    No. 04-12-00427-CR
    Tom Rosales HERNANDEZ,
    Appellant
    v.
    The STATE of Texas,
    Appellee
    From the 144th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas
    Trial Court No. 2010CR0414W
    The Honorable Angus McGinty, Judge Presiding
    Opinion by:       Karen Angelini, Justice
    Sitting:          Karen Angelini, Justice
    Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice
    Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
    Delivered and Filed: March 6, 2013
    AFFIRMED, MOTION TO WITHDRAW GRANTED
    After appellant Tom Rosales Hernandez pled true to violating a condition of his
    community supervision, the trial court revoked his community supervision and sentenced him to
    six months in prison. Hernandez filed a notice of appeal.
    Hernandez’s court-appointed appellate counsel has filed a motion to withdraw and a brief
    in which he concludes that this appeal is frivolous and without merit. See Anders v. California,
    
    386 U.S. 738
    (1967); High v. State, 
    573 S.W.2d 807
    (Tex. Crim. App. 1978). Counsel states
    Hernandez was provided with a copy of the motion to withdraw and the brief, and was informed
    04-12-00427-CR
    of his right to review the record and file his own brief. See Bruns v. State, 
    924 S.W.2d 176
    , 177
    n. 1 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1996, no pet.). Hernandez did not file a pro se brief. We have
    reviewed the record and counsel’s brief. We agree with counsel that this appeal is frivolous and
    without merit. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed, and the motion to withdraw is granted.
    See Nichols v. State, 
    954 S.W.2d 83
    , 85–86 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1997, no pet.); 
    id. No substitute
    counsel will be appointed. Should Hernandez wish to seek further review of
    this case by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, he must either retain an attorney to file a
    petition for discretionary review or file a pro se petition for discretionary review. Any petition
    for discretionary review must be filed within thirty days from the later of (1) the date of this
    opinion; or (2) the date the last timely motion for rehearing is overruled by this court. See TEX.
    R. APP. P. 68.2. Any petition for discretionary review must be filed in the Texas Court of
    Criminal Appeals. See TEX. R. APP. P. 68.3. Any petition for discretionary review should comply
    with the requirements of Rule 68.4 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP.
    P. 68.4.
    Karen Angelini, Justice
    Do not publish
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 04-12-00427-CR

Filed Date: 3/6/2013

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/16/2015