John Robert Jimenez v. State ( 2001 )

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-01-00469-CR
NO. 03-01-00470-CR
NO. 03-01-00471-CR
John Robert Jimenez, Appellant
v.
The State of Texas, Appellee
FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY, 27TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
NOS. 52,011, 52,012 & 52,013, HONORABLE MARTHA J. TRUDO, JUDGE PRESIDING
Appellant John Robert Jimenez pleaded guilty to one count of aggravated sexual
assault and one count of indecency with a child in both Bell County cause number 52,011 and cause
number 52,012. He pleaded guilty to two counts of indecency with a child in cause number 52, 013.
The district court sentenced appellant to imprisonment for life for each count of aggravated sexual
assault, and to imprisonment for twenty years for each count of indecency with a child.
Appellant’s court-appointed attorney filed a brief concluding that the appeals are
frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
(1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the records demonstrating why there are no
arguable grounds to be advanced. See also Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988); High v. State, 573
S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978); Currie v. State, 516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974);
Jackson v. State, 485 S.W.2d 553 (Tex. Crim. App. 1972); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex.
Crim. App. 1969). A copy of counsel’s brief was delivered to appellant, and appellant was advised
of his right to examine the appellate records and to file a pro se brief. No pro se brief has been filed.
We have reviewed the records and counsel’s brief and agree that the appeals are
frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the records that might arguably support the appeals.
Counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted.
The judgments of conviction are affirmed.
__________________________________________
Marilyn Aboussie, Chief Justice
Before Chief Justice Aboussie, Justices B. A. Smith and Puryear
Affirmed
Filed: November 8, 2001
Do Not Publish
2