in Re Wade Meeker, James Meeker, Barney Holland, as Independent of the Estate of Lawrence H. Meeker, and Natasha Wesson ( 2016 )

COURT OF APPEALS
SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS
FORT WORTH
NO. 02-16-00103-CV
In re Wade Meeker, James Meeker, § Original Proceeding
Barney Holland, as Independent
Executor of the Estate of Lawrence § From Probate Court No. 2
H. Meeker, and Natasha Wesson
§ of Tarrant County (2014-PR01451-2-B)
§ June 29, 2016
§ Opinion by Chief Justice Livingston
§ Dissent by Justice Sue Walker
JUDGMENT
This court has considered relators’ petition for writ of mandamus and is of
the opinion that relief should be granted in part and denied in part. We deny
relators’ petition for writ of mandamus to the extent that they complain about the
portions of respondent’s February 24, 2016 order that grants relief to David Alan
Meeker on his rule 202 petition for presuit discovery. We conditionally grant
relators’ petition for writ of mandamus to the extent that relators challenge the
parts of the same order granting relief to Margaret Meeker. A writ will issue only
if respondent fails to comply.
It is further ordered that relators Wade Meeker, James Meeker, Barney
Holland, as Independent Executor of the Estate of Lawrence H. Meeker, and
Natasha Wesson, jointly and severally, and Margaret Meeker shall evenly split
the costs of this proceeding, for which let execution issue.
SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS
By /s/ Terrie Livingston
Chief Justice Terrie Livingston