in Re: York Risk Services Group, Inc., Brad Selph, and Selph Arms, LLC ( 2017 )


Menu:
  •                                          NO. 12-17-00210-CV
    IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
    TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT
    TYLER, TEXAS
    IN RE: YORK RISK SERVICES                                 §
    GROUP, INC., BRAD SELPH, AND
    SELPH ARMS, LLC,                                          §    ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
    RELATOR
    §
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    PER CURIAM
    Relators, York Risk Services Group, Inc., Brad Selph, and Selph Arms, LLC, filed an
    original mandamus proceeding complaining of the trial court’s June 30, 2017 supplemental order
    requiring the production of certain documents. On November 22, 2017, this Court conditionally
    granted Relators’ petition and directed Respondent to (1) vacate his June 30 order that required
    York to provide Corby Hall, Real Party in Interest, with un-redacted versions of documents
    tendered for in camera review; and (2) conduct further proceedings consistent with our opinion.
    By an order signed on December 11, Respondent has complied with this Court’s opinion and
    order, rendering this proceeding moot. Accordingly, we dismiss Relators’ petition for writ of
    mandamus as moot.
    Opinion delivered December 13, 2017.
    Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.
    (PUBLISH)
    COURT OF APPEALS
    TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS
    JUDGMENT
    DECEMBER 13, 2017
    NO. 12-17-00210-CV
    YORK RISK SERVICES GROUP, INC.,
    BRAD SELPH, AND SELPH ARMS, LLC,
    Relators
    V.
    HON. J. CLAY GOSSETT,
    Respondent
    ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
    ON THIS DAY came to be heard the petition for writ of mandamus filed by York
    Risk Services Group, Inc., Brad Selph, and Selph Arms, LLC; relators in Cause No. 2015-351,
    pending on the docket of the 4th Judicial District Court of Rusk County, Texas. Said petition for
    writ of mandamus having been filed herein on July 5, 2017, and the same having been duly
    considered, because it is the opinion of this Court that the writ should not issue, it is therefore
    CONSIDERED, ADJUDGED and ORDERED that the said petition for writ of mandamus be,
    and the same is, hereby dismissed as moot.
    By per curiam opinion.
    Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 12-17-00210-CV

Filed Date: 12/13/2017

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 12/16/2017