State v. Gary Gates ( 2012 )

Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed August 23, 2012.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
NO. 14-12-00571-CR
NO. 14-12-00573-CR
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellant
V.
GARY GATES, Appellee
On Appeal from the County Criminal Court at Law No. 12
Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Cause Nos. 5538 & 5512
MEMORANDUM OPINION
A jury in the City of Houston Municipal Court Number 11 convicted appellee
Gary Gates of two violations of the fine-only offense of failure to maintain property
structural standards pursuant to City of Houston Ordinance Section 10-343. See Houston,
Tex., Code of Ordinances § 10-343 (2007). The jury assessed the maximum fine of
$2,000 for each violation. Gates appealed to Harris County Criminal Court at Law No.
12, which reversed the convictions and rendered judgments of acquittal on both charges
by orders signed May 16, 2012. The State filed a notice of appeal for both offenses on
June 15, 2012.1 See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 44.01 (granting the state the right to
appeal certain orders in criminal cases).
The State must file its notice of appeal within twenty days after the court enters
the order being appealed. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 44.01(d); Tex. R. App. P.
26.2(b). Therefore, the State’s notice of appeal filed thirty days after the orders were
signed and entered is untimely. The State did not file a motion for extension of time to
file its notice of appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.3. The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
has held that when a notice of appeal is filed within the fifteen-day period for filing a
motion for extension of time but no timely motion for extension is filed, the appellate
court lacks jurisdiction. See Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522-24 (Tex. Crim. App.
1996) (rejecting the more “liberal policy” followed in civil cases).
A notice of appeal which complies with the requirements of Texas Rule or
Appellate Procedure 26 is essential to vest the court of appeals with jurisdiction. Slaton v.
State, 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). If an appeal is not timely perfected,
a court of appeals does not obtain jurisdiction to address the merits of the appeal and can
take no action other than to dismiss the appeal. Id.
On July 25, 2012, this court advised the parties of our intention to dismiss these
appeals for want of jurisdiction unless any party filed a response by August 6, 2012,
demonstrating that we have jurisdiction over the appeals. No response was filed.
1
The “state” may appeal an order reversing a municipal court conviction such as in these cases.
See State v. Blankenship, 146 S.W.3d 218, 218 n.1 (Tex. Crim. App. 2004).
2
Accordingly, the appeals are ordered dismissed.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Seymore, Boyce, and McCally.
Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
3