Chaz Anthony Phillip Jones v. State ( 2018 )

IN THE
TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10-17-00317-CR
CHAZ ANTHONY PHILLIP JONES,
Appellant
v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS,
Appellee
From the 413th District Court
Johnson County, Texas
Trial Court No. F50789
ORDER
Counsel for appellant filed an Anders brief.1 In accordance with the Court of
Criminal Appeals' opinion in Kelly v. State, counsel prepared and sent to appellant a
Motion for Pro Se Access to the Appellate Record. See Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313, 320
(Tex. Crim. App. 2014). Appellant, Chaz Anthony Phillip Jones, has signed the motion
for access and sent it to this Court. It was filed on June 8, 2018. Appellant's Motion for
1
Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967).
Pro Se Access to the Appellate Record is granted and will be implemented as provided
for herein.
The procedure to be followed to provide an appellant with access to the appellate
record is the procedure announced in Stanley v. State, 523 S.W.3d 122 (Tex. App.—Waco
2015, order).
Accordingly, counsel is ORDERED to obtain and send appellant, within 21 days
from the date of this order, copies of the clerk's and reporter's records and to
simultaneously notify this Court, the State, the trial court, and the trial court clerk when
counsel has completed this task.2 Counsel must also notify appellant and this Court if
the record made available to appellant must be returned to the trial court clerk. Further,
it may be necessary for counsel to explain to appellant why certain parts of the record are
not available to an appellant due to the nature of the testimony or exhibits.
Counsel is reminded that there are certain rules and statutes that prohibit certain
sensitive or illegal information from being included in a public record. See TEX. R. APP.
P. 9.10. If counsel has identified any such information while conducting the review of the
record as necessary to prepare the Anders brief in support of counsel's motion to
withdraw, counsel should take appropriate steps to redact or in some manner remove
that information from the copy of the record that is being provided to appellant.
Appellant is ORDERED to file his pro se response to counsel's Anders brief within
45 days from the date counsel sends notice to the Court that the record has been
2
Counsel may prepare and provide a duplicate copy or simply provide the copy obtained from the trial
court clerk pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 34.5(g) (clerk's record) and 34.6(b) (reporter's
record) to appellant. See Stanley v. State, 523 S.W.3d 122, 124 (Tex. App.—Waco 2015, order).
Jones v. State Page 2
forwarded to appellant, unless the due date is extended by order of this Court upon
proper and timely motion by appellant. If counsel notified appellant and this Court that
the record being provided to appellant was obtained from the trial court clerk and must
be returned thereto, appellant is ORDERED to not take the record apart or mark on or
modify the record.
If the record must be returned to the trial court clerk, so that its return to the trial
court clerk can be monitored and enforced, appellant is ORDERED to send the record to
this Court with appellant's response. If no response is filed, but nevertheless, the record
must be returned to the trial court clerk, appellant is ORDERED to send the record to this
Court within 60 days of the date the attorney sends notice to the Court that the record
was forwarded to appellant, unless the due date is extended by order of this Court upon
proper and timely motion by appellant.
Appellant's failure to comply with this Order, including the failure to send the
record to this Court within the time specified, may result in the dismissal of the appeal
under our inherent authority upon the presumption that the record was obtained under
false pretense and with no intent to pursue the appeal but instead was obtained for the
purposes of delay. See e.g. Ealy v. State, 222 S.W.3d 744, 745 (Tex. App.—Waco 2007, no
pet.).
PER CURIAM
Before Chief Justice Gray,
Justice Davis, and
Justice Scoggins
Motion granted
Order issued and filed June 20, 2018
Jones v. State Page 3