in Re: The State of Texas ( 2010 )


Menu:
  •                                     COURT OF APPEALS
    EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
    EL PASO, TEXAS
    §
    No. 08-10-00059-CR
    §
    IN RE: THE STATE OF TEXAS                                  AN ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
    §
    RELATOR.                                                           IN MANDAMUS
    §
    §
    OPINION
    Relator, The State of Texas, filed a petition for writ of mandamus against the Honorable
    Alejandro (Alex) Gonzalez, Judge of the County Court at Law No. 4, complaining of the trial
    court’s issuance of a writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum. We conditionally grant the
    mandamus.
    On February 13, 2008, Jose Manuel Rodriguez-Garcia pled guilty to possession of
    marijuana and was sentenced to one day in county jail. Approximately one year later, while in
    federal custody on removal proceedings, Rodriguez-Garcia filed an application for writ of habeas
    corpus, attacking his state conviction on grounds of ineffective assistance of counsel. A hearing
    was set on the matter for February 22, 2010. Prior to that hearing, Rodriguez-Garcia filed a
    motion for the issuance of a writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum, which requested the state
    court to order his release from federal custody for the purposes of appearing at a hearing on his
    habeas-corpus application. The trial court issued the writ ad testificandum. Subsequently, the
    district attorney filed a motion to vacate the writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum in light of our
    previous decisions in In re State, No. 08-09-00181-CR, 
    2010 WL 335630
    , *3 (Tex.App.--El Paso
    Jan. 29, 2010, orig. proceeding)(not designated for publication), and In re State, No. 08-10-
    00038-CR, — S.W.3d —, 
    2010 WL 144040
    , *3 (Tex.App.--El Paso Jan. 13, 2010, orig.
    proceeding)(not yet reported).
    We recently held that while a state court may entertain a hearing on an applicant’s
    habeas-corpus application filed under Chapter 11 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, it
    has no authority to compel an inmate’s release from federal custody for purposes of attending
    that hearing. See In re State, 
    2010 WL 335630
    at *3; In re State, 
    2010 WL 144040
    at *3. Based
    on our recent decisions, we conditionally grant the Relator’s request for mandamus relief on the
    trial court’s order issuing a writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum. We are confident the trial
    court will vacate the order in accordance with this opinion, and the writ will issue only if the trial
    court fails to do so.
    February 19, 2010
    DAVID WELLINGTON CHEW, Chief Justice
    Before Chew, C.J., McClure, and Rivera, JJ.
    (Do Not Publish)
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 08-10-00059-CR

Filed Date: 2/19/2010

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/16/2015