Thomas Paul Tadsen v. State ( 2016 )


Menu:
  •                                                                           FILE COPY
    COURT OF APPEALS
    SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS
    FORT WORTH
    NO. 02-15-00260-CR
    NO. 02-15-00261-CR
    THOMAS PAUL TADSEN                                                    APPELLANT
    V.
    THE STATE OF TEXAS                                                          STATE
    ------------
    FROM THE 396TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY
    TRIAL COURT NO. 1378634R, 1379351R
    ------------
    ABATEMENT ORDER
    ------------
    It has come to our attention that appellant's brief has not been filed.
    Appellant’s brief was originally due on December 2, 2016. We have notified the
    trial court judge and the attorneys of record that appellant's brief has not been
    filed, as required by rule 38.8(b). See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b). Because we have
    not received a satisfactory response to our prior notification and in accordance
    with rule 38.8(b), we abate the appeal and remand this case to the trial court.
    FILE COPY
    The trial court shall conduct a hearing, with appellant and appointed
    counsel, John W. Stickels, present. At the hearing, the court shall make the
    following findings on the record:
    1.    Determine whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal;
    2.    Determine why appointed counsel has not filed a brief and
    whether counsel has abandoned the appeal;
    3.    If appointed counsel has not abandoned the appeal and
    appellant desires to continue the appeal, determine the exact
    date that counsel will file a brief on appellant’s behalf in the
    court of appeals;
    4.    Determine whether substitute counsel should be appointed to
    represent appellant and appoint substitute counsel, if
    necessary;1
    5.    Determine whether appellant desires to proceed pro se. If so,
    admonish appellant of the dangers and disadvantages of self-
    representation in accordance with Faretta v. California, 
    422 U.S. 806
    , 835, 
    95 S. Ct. 2525
    , 2541 (1975) and Hubbard v.
    State, 
    739 S.W.2d 341
    , 345 (Tex. Crim. App. 1987) and
    determine whether appellant’s decision to proceed pro se is
    competently and intelligently made; and
    6.    Take any other measures that the trial court deems necessary
    to insure appellant does not forfeit his right to appeal.
    The trial court shall file a record of the hearing in this court on or before
    Friday, February 5, 2016. The record shall include a supplemental reporter's
    record and supplemental clerk's record. Upon our receipt of the supplemental
    1If substitute counsel has been appointed to represent appellant, the
    supplemental record shall reflect that substitute counsel has been notified of the
    appointment. If appellant is incarcerated, the trial court shall also retain him in
    the county for a reasonable period of time to allow substitute counsel an
    opportunity to confer with appellant.
    2
    FILE COPY
    record, the appeal of this cause shall be reinstated automatically without further
    order.
    The clerk of this court shall transmit a copy of this order to the attorneys of
    record, the trial court judge, the trial court clerk, and the court reporter.
    DATED January 6, 2016.
    PER CURIAM
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 02-15-00261-CR

Filed Date: 1/6/2016

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 1/7/2016