Herbert L. Polinard, Jr. v. Jo Ann Karambis, Margaret Comparin, Ronaldo Dunagan, Lynda C. Spence, and EXP Realty LLC ( 2021 )


Menu:
  •                             Fourth Court of Appeals
    San Antonio, Texas
    August 30, 2021
    No. 04-21-00251-CV
    Herbert L. POLINARD, Jr.,
    Appellant
    v.
    Jo Ann KARAMBIS, Margaret Comparin, Ronaldo Dunagan, Lynda C. Spence, and EXP
    Realty LLC,
    Appellees
    From the 166th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas
    Trial Court No. 2018-CI-11887
    Honorable Antonia Arteaga, Judge Presiding
    ORDER
    On August 11, 2021, we issued an opinion and judgment dismissing this appeal for want
    of prosecution based on appellant’s failure to pay the filing fee for the appeal. See TEX. R. APP.
    P. 42.3(b). Appellant thereafter paid the filing fee and requested reinstatement of the appeal,
    citing oversight by his counsel. Accordingly, on our own motion, we WITHDRAW our prior
    opinion and judgment issued on August 11, 2021 and REINSTATE this appeal on our docket.
    See TEX. R. APP. P. 19.1 (court of appeals’ plenary power). It is ORDERED that appellant’s
    brief is due on or before September 24, 2021. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a).
    Additionally, the trial court signed a final judgment on March 5, 2021 and the appellant
    filed a motion for new trial on April 4, 2021. Therefore, the notice of appeal was due to be filed
    on June 3, 2021. See TEX. R. APP. P. 4.1(a), 26.1. A motion for extension of time to file the
    notice of appeal was due on June 18, 2021. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.3. Although appellant filed a
    notice of appeal within the fifteen-day grace period allowed by Rule 26.3, he did not file a
    motion for extension of time. A motion for extension of time is necessarily implied when an
    appellant, acting in good faith, files a notice of appeal beyond the time allowed by Rule 26.1 but
    within the fifteen-day grace period provided by Rule 26.3 for filing a motion for extension of
    time. See Verburgt v. Dorner, 
    959 S.W.2d 615
    , 617 (Tex. 1997) (construing the predecessor to
    Rule 26). However, the appellant must offer a reasonable explanation for failing to file the
    notice of appeal in a timely manner. See id.; TEX. R. APP. P. 26.3, 10.5(b)(1)(C).
    It is therefore further ORDERED that appellant file a response presenting a reasonable
    explanation for failing to file a notice of appeal in a timely manner on or before September 10,
    2021. If appellant fails to respond within the time provided, the appeal will be dismissed. See
    TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c).
    It is so ORDERED August 30, 2021.
    PER CURIAM
    ATTESTED TO:__________________________
    MICHAEL A. CRUZ,
    CLERK OF COURT
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 04-21-00251-CV

Filed Date: 8/30/2021

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 8/31/2021