Joe Anthony Alvarez v. State ( 2016 )


Menu:
  • Order filed October 6, 2016
    In The
    Eleventh Court of Appeals
    ____________
    No. 11-16-00176-CR
    __________
    JOE ANTHONY ALVAREZ, Appellant
    V.
    THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
    On Appeal from the 104th District Court
    Taylor County, Texas
    Trial Court Cause No. 19636B
    ORDER
    Upon receipt of the clerk’s record, this court became aware of a July 8, 2016
    order in which the trial court permitted Kevin W. Willhelm, court-appointed counsel
    for Joe Anthony Alvarez, to withdraw as counsel of record for Alvarez. In the order,
    the trial court noted that Alvarez is indigent and entitled to the appointment of
    counsel to represent him on appeal. However, the trial court has not appointed
    counsel to replace Willhelm.
    We abate the appeal and remand the cause to the trial court so that the trial
    court may either appoint counsel for Alvarez or conduct a hearing to determine the
    following:
    1. Whether Alvarez desires to prosecute this appeal;
    2. Whether Alvarez is still indigent;
    3. If not indigent, whether Alvarez has retained counsel for this appeal; and
    4. If indigent, whether Alvarez desires to have counsel appointed to represent
    him in this appeal or whether, after being warned of the dangers and
    disadvantages of self-representation, Alvarez competently and intelligently
    chooses to exercise the right to represent himself.
    In the event that the trial court determines that Alvarez is indigent and is exercising
    his right to represent himself, the trial court must develop evidence as to whether
    Alvarez’s decision to proceed without counsel is knowingly and intelligently made.
    See Faretta v. California, 
    422 U.S. 806
    (1975); Ex parte Davis, 
    818 S.W.2d 64
    (Tex.
    Crim. App. 1991); Hubbard v. State, 
    739 S.W.2d 341
    , 345 (Tex. Crim. App. 1987);
    Webb v. State, 
    533 S.W.2d 780
    , 783–86 (Tex. Crim. App. 1976). If the trial court
    conducts a hearing, the trial court is directed to enter findings of fact and conclusions
    of law and to make any appropriate recommendations to this court. We note that
    Alvarez need not appear in person at the hearing and that the trial court may permit
    him to appear via telephone.
    The clerk of the trial court is directed to prepare and forward to this court a
    supplemental clerk’s record containing any findings, recommendations, and orders
    of the trial court related to this abatement. If the trial court conducts a hearing, the
    court reporter is directed to prepare and forward to this court the reporter’s record
    from the hearing. These records are due to be filed in this court on or before
    October 28, 2016.
    2
    The appeal is abated.
    PER CURIAM
    October 6, 2016
    Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
    Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,
    Willson, J., and Bailey, J.
    3