Harmon L. Taylor v. State of Texas Ex Rel., Whitney Brewster, Exec. Dir., Texas Department of Motor Vehicles ( 2018 )


Menu:
  • Dismissed; Opinion Filed July 2, 2018.
    In The
    Court of Appeals
    Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
    No. 05-18-00691-CR
    No. 05-18-00692-CR
    No. 05-18-00693-CR
    No. 05-18-00694-CR
    No. 05-18-00695-CR
    HARMON L. TAYLOR, Appellant
    V.
    STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
    On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2
    Grayson County, Texas
    Trial Court Cause Nos. 2018-2-0223, 2018-2-0224, 2018-2-0225, 2018-2-0226 & 2018-2-0227
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    Before Justices Lang-Miers, Evans, and Schenck
    Opinion by Justice Evans
    Harmon L. Taylor appeals the municipal court’s judgments finding him guilty of operating
    a motor vehicle without license plates; expired registration–display expired license plates; no proof
    of financial responsibility/liability insurance; no driver’s license; and failure to appear/bail
    jumping. After being found guilty of each violation by a jury in municipal court, appellant filed
    appeals in County Court at Law No. 2 where he then filed a “Plea to the Jurisdiction” and “Special
    Appearance” in each appeal. In orders dated June 6, 2018, the trial court denied each of his pleas
    and special appearances. Appellant then filed these appeals.
    As a general rule, an appellate court may consider appeals by criminal defendants only
    after conviction or the entry of a narrow set of appealable interlocutory orders. TEX. R. APP. P.
    26.2(a)(1); see Leija v. State, 
    456 S.W.3d 157
    , 158 (Tex. Crim. App. 2015); Saliba v. State, 
    45 S.W.3d 329
    , 329 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2001, no pet.). Intermediate appellate courts have no
    jurisdiction to review interlocutory orders absent express authority. See Apolinar v. State, 
    820 S.W.2d 792
    , 794 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991); Wright, 969 S.W.2d at 589. An order denying a plea to
    the jurisdiction or special appearance is not an appealable order in a criminal case. See Wright,
    969 S.W.2d at 589; Stevens v. State, No. 03-15-00675-CR, 
    2016 WL 286328
    , *1 (Tex. App.—
    Austin 2016, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publication). We do not find any grant of
    authority to review by interlocutory appeal the denial of a plea to the jurisdiction or special
    appearance in a criminal case.
    We dismiss these appeals for want of jurisdiction.
    /David Evans/
    DAVID EVANS
    JUSTICE
    Do Not Publish
    TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b)
    180691F.U05
    –2–
    Court of Appeals
    Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
    JUDGMENT
    HARMON L. TAYLOR, Appellant                         On Appeal from the County Court at Law
    No. 2, Grayson County, Texas
    No. 05-18-00691-CR         V.                       Trial Court Cause No. 2018-2-0223.
    Opinion delivered by Justice Evans,
    STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee                            Justices Lang-Miers and Schenck
    participating.
    Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS this appeal.
    Judgment entered this 2nd day of July, 2018.
    –3–
    Court of Appeals
    Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
    JUDGMENT
    HARMON L. TAYLOR, Appellant                         On Appeal from the County Court at Law
    No. 2, Grayson County, Texas
    No. 05-18-00692-CR         V.                       Trial Court Cause No. 2018-2-0224.
    Opinion delivered by Justice Evans,
    STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee                            Justices Lang-Miers and Schenck
    participating.
    Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS this appeal.
    Judgment entered this 2nd day of July, 2018.
    –4–
    Court of Appeals
    Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
    JUDGMENT
    HARMON L. TAYLOR, Appellant                         On Appeal from the County Court at Law
    No. 2, Grayson County, Texas
    No. 05-18-00693-CR         V.                       Trial Court Cause No. 2018-2-0225.
    Opinion delivered by Justice Evans,
    STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee                            Justices Lang-Miers and Schenck
    participating.
    Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS this appeal.
    Judgment entered this 2nd day of July, 2018.
    –5–
    Court of Appeals
    Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
    JUDGMENT
    HARMON L. TAYLOR, Appellant                         On Appeal from the County Court at Law
    No. 2, Grayson County, Texas
    No. 05-18-00694-CR         V.                       Trial Court Cause No. 2018-2-0226.
    Opinion delivered by Justice Evans,
    STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee                            Justices Lang-Miers and Schenck
    participating.
    Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS this appeal.
    Judgment entered this 2nd day of July, 2018.
    –6–
    Court of Appeals
    Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
    JUDGMENT
    HARMON L. TAYLOR, Appellant                         On Appeal from the County Court at Law
    No. 2, Grayson County, Texas
    No. 05-18-00695-CR         V.                       Trial Court Cause No. 2018-2-0227.
    Opinion delivered by Justice Evans,
    STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee                            Justices Lang-Miers and Schenck
    participating.
    Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS this appeal.
    Judgment entered this 2nd day of July, 2018.
    –7–
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 05-18-00691-CR

Filed Date: 7/2/2018

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 7/4/2018