Samuel Ukwuachu v. State ( 2018 )


Menu:
  •                                   IN THE
    TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
    No. 10-15-00376-CR
    SAMUEL UKWUACHU,
    Appellant
    v.
    THE STATE OF TEXAS,
    Appellee
    From the 54th District Court
    McLennan County, Texas
    Trial Court No. 2014-1202-C2
    ORDER
    The Court has received the Court of Criminal Appeals’ mandate which issued on
    July 26, 2018.   This appeal was remanded for further proceedings on appellant’s
    remaining issues raised on appeal.
    The appeal now stands at the point as if the record has just been filed, and
    appellant's brief is due 30 days from the date we received the return of the record from
    the Court of Criminal Appeals. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a); Robinson v. State, 
    790 S.W.2d 334
    , 335-36 (Tex. Crim. App. 1990). The State’s brief is due 30 days after appellant’s brief
    is filed. TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(b). The current rules of appellate procedure contemplate a
    physical transfer between the courts of a single hard copy record. That is no longer
    necessary since we retain an electronic copy of the record at the time we “forward” the
    record to the Court of Criminal Appeals. Accordingly, we will treat the date we receive
    the mandate as also being the date we receive the record that is “returned” to this Court.
    Consequently, appellant’s brief is due August 27, 2018.           Under the circumstances,
    however, the Court, sua sponte, grants appellant an extension of time to file appellant’s
    brief. Appellant’s brief is due September 26, 2018.
    If the parties notify the Court they intend to rely on the original briefs and that no
    new brief will be filed that supersedes all the party’s existing briefs on file, the Court will
    proceed on the existing briefs on the issue or issues that have not been addressed by this
    Court and in light of the Court of Criminal Appeals’ opinion as directed. Thus, if the
    parties do not wish to file a new brief, they may expedite our ability to review the issues
    necessary to a disposition of this proceeding by submitting a letter expressly waiving the
    filing of a new brief.
    If a new brief or letter notifying the Court that the appellant will waive the filing
    of a new brief and rely on the original brief is not timely filed, this proceeding must be
    abated to the trial court for a hearing to determine why no brief has been timely filed on
    behalf of appellant. TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b); see Robinson v. State, 
    790 S.W.2d 334
    , 335-36
    (Tex. Crim. App. 1990); see also Williams v. State, 
    790 S.W.2d 336
    , 337-38 (Tex. Crim. App.
    1990).
    PER CURIAM
    Ukwuachu v. State                                                                        Page 2
    Before Chief Justice Gray,
    Justice Davis, and
    Justice Scoggins
    Briefing ordered
    Order issued and filed August 22, 2018
    Ukwuachu v. State                        Page 3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 10-15-00376-CR

Filed Date: 8/22/2018

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 8/23/2018