Gerald Stevens v. State ( 2016 )


Menu:
  •       TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
    NO. 03-15-00675-CR
    NO. 03-15-00676-CR
    Gerald Stevens, Appellant
    v.
    The State of Texas, Appellee
    FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 5 OF TRAVIS COUNTY
    NOS. C-1-CR-15-100025 & C-1-CR-15-100026
    HONORABLE NANCY WRIGHT HOHENGARTEN, JUDGE PRESIDING
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    A jury in justice court found Gerald Stevens guilty of speeding and of no operator’s
    license on demand. The jury assessed a $200 fine in each case. Stevens sought a trial de novo in
    the county court at law, then filed a special appearance and plea to the jurisdiction in each case. The
    county court at law denied Stevens’s special appearances and pleas to the jurisdiction, and Stevens
    filed a Notice of Appeal challenging those decisions in each case. We dismiss these appeals because
    we lack jurisdiction to consider their merits in an interlocutory appeal.
    Interlocutory appeals—those made before a final judgment is rendered in the
    trial court—are generally not permitted in Texas criminal proceedings. Leija v. State, 
    456 S.W.3d 157
    , 158 (Tex. Crim. App. 2015). The offenses of which Stevens was convicted carry criminal
    penalties. See Tex. Transp. Code §§ 521.025 (failure to display license on demand), 545.351
    (speeding); see also 
    id. § 542.301
    (general offense level). Stevens appealed the justice court’s
    judgments to obtain a trial de novo in the county court at law. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 44.17.
    The record contains no final judgments in these cases from the county court at law. We do not find
    any grant of authority to review by interlocutory appeal the denial of a plea to the jurisdiction
    or special appearance in a criminal case. Stevens cites to Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code
    section 51.014 but, as the title of that code indicates, that is expressly a civil practice statute; we find
    no basis on which to apply it in these criminal cases.
    We dismiss these appeals for want of jurisdiction.
    Jeff Rose, Chief Justice
    Before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Pemberton and Bourland
    Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction
    Filed: January 22, 2016
    Do Not Publish
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 03-15-00675-CR

Filed Date: 1/22/2016

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 1/26/2016