Jesse James Arzola, Jr. v. State ( 2015 )


Menu:
  •                                                                                  The State of
    Fourth Court of Appeals
    San Antonio, Texas
    November 20, 2015
    No. 04-15-00681-CR
    Jesse James ARZOLA, Jr.,
    Appellant
    v.
    The STATE of Texas,
    Appellee
    From the 187th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas
    Trial Court No. 2014CR7485
    Honorable Steve Hilbig, Judge Presiding
    ORDER
    In April 2015, Jesse Arzola Jr. was convicted of the offense of harassment of a public
    servant and sentenced by the trial court. On November 2, 2015, Arzola filed a motion for leave to
    file a late notice of appeal in this court. According to the motion, more than thirty days have
    elapsed since Arzola’s sentence was imposed. On November 17, 2015, the trial court clerk filed a
    notification of late record stating that a notice of appeal was never filed in the trial court.
    A timely notice of appeal is necessary to invoke our jurisdiction. Slaton v. State, 
    981 S.W.2d 208
    , 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998); Olivo v. State, 
    918 S.W.2d 519
    , 522 (Tex. Crim. App.
    1996). A notice of appeal is timely if filed within thirty days after the day sentence is imposed or
    suspended in open court, or within ninety days after sentencing, if a timely motion for new trial
    is filed. 
    Olivo, 918 S.W.2d at 522
    . A late notice of appeal may be considered timely so as to
    invoke our jurisdiction if (1) it is filed in the trial court within fifteen days of the last day allowed
    for filing; (2) a motion for extension of time is filed in the court of appeals within fifteen days of
    the last day allowed for filing the notice of appeal, and (3) the court of appeals grants the motion
    for extension of time. Id.; see also TEX. R. APP. P. 26.3.
    Here, nothing indicates that Arzola filed a notice of appeal in the trial court. Therefore, it
    appears that we have no jurisdiction over the appeal, and we can take no action other than to
    dismiss the appeal. See 
    Slaton, 981 S.W.2d at 210
    (“Without a timely filed notice of appeal, a
    court of appeals lacks jurisdiction over the appeal....”).
    We, therefore, ORDER Arzola to show cause on or before December 11, 2015, why this
    appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. All appellate deadlines are suspended
    until further order of the court.
    _________________________________
    Karen Angelini, Justice
    IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said
    court on this 20th day of November, 2015.
    ___________________________________
    Keith E. Hottle
    Clerk of Court
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 04-15-00681-CR

Filed Date: 11/20/2015

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/23/2015