in Re Valero Refining-Texas, L.P. ( 2015 )


Menu:
  • Opinion issued November 10, 2015
    In The
    Court of Appeals
    For The
    First District of Texas
    ————————————
    NO. 01-15-00566-CV
    ———————————
    IN RE VALERO REFINING—TEXAS, L.P., Relator
    Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    Relator, Valero Refining—Texas, L.P., filed a petition for writ of mandamus
    on June 29, 2015, seeking to compel the trial court to vacate its order reaffirming
    the original trial judge’s order granting a new trial in the underlying lawsuit.1 On
    1
    The Honorable Patricia Grady, Judge of the 212th District Court of Galveston
    County, Texas, Respondent. The underlying lawsuit is Vernon Fox and Mikki Fox
    v. Valero Refining—Texas, L.P., No. 12CV1541 (212th Dist. Ct., Galveston Cnty.,
    Tex.).
    September 16, 2015, we abated the mandamus proceeding to allow the trial court
    the opportunity to provide its reasons for reaffirming the original trial judge’s order
    granting a new trial.     See, e.g., In re Columbia Med. Ctr. of Las Colinas,
    Subsidiary, L.P., 
    290 S.W.3d 204
    , 214 (Tex. 2009) (orig. proceeding) (stating that
    when successor trial judge enters order reaffirming granting of motion for new
    trial, “[t]hat order is effectively an order refusing to enter judgment on the jury
    verdict and affects the rights of the parties no less than did the orders of the
    original judge”); In re Baylor Med. Ctr. at Garland, 
    289 S.W.3d 859
    , 861 (Tex.
    2009) (orig. proceeding) (“[T]he trial court abused its discretion by refusing to
    enter judgment on the jury verdict and granting a new trial without specifying its
    reasons for doing so.”). Relator subsequently informed this Court that the trial
    court had reconsidered the new-trial order and had entered an order reinstating the
    final take-nothing judgment entered in relator’s favor. Relator filed an unopposed
    motion to dismiss its mandamus petition as moot on October 21, 2015.
    Accordingly, we reinstate the mandamus proceeding and dismiss the petition
    for writ of mandamus as moot.
    PER CURIAM
    Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Massengale, and Lloyd.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 01-15-00566-CV

Filed Date: 11/10/2015

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/11/2015