Leinyuy Robert Yangeh v. State ( 2016 )


Menu:
  • Opinion issued January 21, 2016
    In The
    Court of Appeals
    For The
    First District of Texas
    ————————————
    NO. 01-15-01051-CR
    NO. 01-15-01052-CR
    ———————————
    LEINYUY ROBERT YANGEH, Appellant
    V.
    THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
    On Appeal from the 176th District Court
    Harris County, Texas
    Trial Court Case Nos. 1473903 & 1473904
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    Appellant, Leinyuy Robert Yangeh, pled guilty to the felony offense of
    possession with intent to deliver a controlled substance. The trial court found
    appellant guilty and, in accordance with the terms of appellant’s plea bargain
    agreement with the State, sentenced appellant to 7 years’ incarceration in the
    Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. Appellant filed
    a pro se notice of appeal.
    In a plea bargain case, a defendant may only appeal those matters that were
    raised by written motion filed and ruled on before trial or after getting the trial
    court’s permission to appeal. TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). An appeal must be
    dismissed if a certification showing that the defendant has the right of appeal has
    not been made part of the record. TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d).
    Here, the trial court’s certification is included in the record on appeal. See 
    id. The trial
    court’s certification states that this is a plea bargain case and that the
    defendant has no right of appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). The record
    supports the trial court’s certification. See Dears v. State, 
    154 S.W.3d 610
    , 615
    (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). Because appellant has no right of appeal, we must
    dismiss this appeal. See Chavez v. State, 
    183 S.W.3d 675
    , 680 (Tex. Crim. App.
    2006) (“A court of appeals, while having jurisdiction to ascertain whether an
    appellant who plea-bargained is permitted to appeal by Rule 25.2(a)(2), must
    dismiss a prohibited appeal without further action, regardless of the basis for the
    appeal.”).
    Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. We dismiss any
    pending motions as moot.
    2
    PER CURIAM
    Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Massengale and Brown.
    Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 01-15-01051-CR

Filed Date: 1/21/2016

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 1/22/2016