Feltner Dean Hunt v. State ( 2019 )


Menu:
  • Order entered July 31, 2019
    In The
    Court of Appeals
    Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
    No. 05-19-00845-CR
    FELTNER DEAN HUNT, Appellant
    V.
    THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
    On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 7
    Dallas County, Texas
    Trial Court Cause No. F18-75195-R
    ORDER
    Before the Court is appellant’s July 17, 2019 “Motion to Extend Time to File Notice of
    Appeal or Deem Notice of Appeal Sufficient.” The trial court’s judgment was entered June 7,
    2019. That same day, appellant filed a notice of appeal. Although the June 7th notice of appeal
    contains various errors, the notice is in writing, was filed with the trial court clerk, and “shows
    the party’s desire to appeal from the judgment.” See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(c). This appears to be
    sufficient under rule 25.2(c). Harkcom v. State, 
    484 S.W.3d 432
    , 434 (Tex. Crim. App. 2016);
    Few v. State, 
    230 S.W.3d 184
    , 189 (Tex. Crim. App. 2007).
    In his July 17, 2019 motion, appellant notes the numerous errors in the June 7th notice of
    appeal. To the extent appellant seeks to correct the errors, the rules of appellate procedure
    provide “[a]n amended notice of appeal . . . may be filed in the appellate court accordance with
    Rule 37.1, or at any time before the appealing party’s brief is filed if the court of appeals has not
    used Rule 37.1.” See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(f). Although appellant attaches a corrected amended
    notice of appeal as an exhibit to his motion, the amended notice of appeal itself has not been
    filed with the Court.
    We DENY appellant’s motion without prejudice to filing an amended notice of appeal
    under rule 25.2(f).
    /s/     ROBERT D. BURNS, III
    CHIEF JUSTICE
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 05-19-00845-CR

Filed Date: 7/31/2019

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 8/1/2019