kerwin-gibbs-v-allsups-convenience-stores-inc-and-federated-mutual ( 2006 )


Menu:
  • NO. 07-05-0340-CV


    IN THE COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS


    AT AMARILLO


    PANEL A


    FEBRUARY 10, 2006



    ______________________________

    KERWIN GIBBS, APPELLANT


    V.


    ALLSUP'S CONVENIENCE STORES, INC. AND

    FEDERATED MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY,

    FEDERATED INSURANCE AN ASSUMED NAME

    OF FEDERATED MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY

    AND/OR FEDERATED SERVICES INSURANCE COMPANY

    AND DAWN WILLEFORD, APPELLEES

    _________________________________


    FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 3 OF LUBBOCK COUNTY;


    NO. 2005-597,010; HONORABLE PAULA LANEHART, JUDGE

    _______________________________




    Before REAVIS and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ.

    ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

    By opinion dated December 16, 2005, this court dismissed appellant, Kerwin Gibbs' appeal for want of prosecution pursuant to Rule 38.8(a)(1) and 42.3(b), (c) of the Texas Rules of Appellate procedure. By motion for rehearing, appellant contends all matters in controversy were settled between the parties prior to this court's order. The pleadings and the motion for dismissal filed with the petition for rehearing confirm this contention. Accordingly, the motion for rehearing is granted and the case is reinstated.

    Appellant has filed before this court a motion to dismiss the appeal, citing settlement of all matters in controversy. Appellee has confirmed the settlement by a responsive pleading. From the record it is clear that appellant does not desire to pursue the appeal.

    Without passing on the merits of the appeal, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a). Pursuant to the motion, costs are to be assessed against the party incurring them. Having dismissed the appeal by agreement of the parties, no motion for rehearing will be entertained and our mandate will issue forthwith.



    Mackey K. Hancock

    Justice









    828 (1985) (holding that an indigent defendant is entitled to the effective assistance of counsel on the first appeal as of right and that counsel must be available to assist in preparing and submitting an appellate brief).

    The trial court is further ordered to execute findings of fact and conclusions of law addressing the foregoing subjects. Should the trial court find that appellant desires to pursue this appeal, is indigent, and was denied effective assistance of counsel, then we also direct it to appoint new counsel to assist appellant in the prosecution of the appeal. The name, address, phone number, telefax number, and state bar number of the new counsel appointed to represent appellant must also be included in the court's findings of fact and conclusions of law. Furthermore, the trial court shall also cause to be developed 1) a supplemental clerk's record containing the findings of fact and conclusions of law, and 2) a reporter's record transcribing the evidence and argument presented at the aforementioned hearing. Additionally, the trial court shall cause the supplemental clerk's record reporter's record to be filed with the clerk of this court on or before March 25, 2002. Should additional time be needed to perform these tasks, the trial court may request same on or before March 25, 2002.

    It is so ordered.

    Per Curiam





    Do not publish.

Document Info

Docket Number: 07-05-00340-CV

Filed Date: 2/10/2006

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/1/2016