Carlos Rivas v. the State of Texas ( 2021 )


Menu:
  •                             Fourth Court of Appeals
    San Antonio, Texas
    September 10, 2021
    No. 04-21-00379-CR
    Carlos RIVAS,
    Appellant
    v.
    THE STATE OF TEXAS,
    Appellee
    From the 187th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas
    Trial Court No. 2016CR9547-W3
    Honorable Steve Hilbig, Judge Presiding
    ORDER
    Appellant, proceeding pro se, seeks to appeal the denial of his post-conviction application
    for writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to article 11.07. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art.
    11.07, § 3(a). Under the exclusive procedure outlined in article 11.07, only the convicting trial
    court and the Court of Criminal Appeals have jurisdiction to review the merits of a post-
    conviction habeas petition; there is no role for the intermediate courts of appeals in the statutory
    scheme. Id. art. 11.07, § 5 (providing “[a]fter conviction the procedure outlined in this Act shall
    be exclusive and any other proceeding shall be void and of no force and effect in discharging the
    prisoner”). Only the Court of Criminal Appeals has jurisdiction to grant post-conviction release
    from confinement for persons with a felony conviction. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 11.07,
    § 3; Hoang v. State, 
    872 S.W.2d 694
    , 697 (Tex. Crim. App. 1993); In re Stone, 
    26 S.W.3d 568
    ,
    569 (Tex. App.—Waco 2000, orig. proceeding). The intermediate courts of appeals have no
    jurisdiction over post-conviction writs of habeas corpus in felony cases. Bd. of Pardons &
    Paroles ex rel. Keene v. Court of Appeals for the Eighth District, 
    910 S.W.2d 481
    , 483 (Tex.
    Crim. App. 1995) (orig. proceeding); see In re Coronado, 
    980 S.W.2d 691
    , 692 (Tex. App.—San
    Antonio 1998, orig. proceeding); Ex parte Ngo, No. 02-16-00425-CR, 
    2016 WL 7405836
    , at *1
    (Tex. App.—Fort Worth Dec. 22, 2016) (mem. op., not designated for publication) (appeal
    dismissed for lack of jurisdiction).
    Accordingly, we ORDER appellant to show cause in writing by September 27, 2021
    why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
    _________________________________
    Beth Watkins, Justice
    IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said
    court on this 10th day of September, 2021.
    ___________________________________
    MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 04-21-00379-CR

Filed Date: 9/10/2021

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/14/2021