Louis v. Doss, Individually, and as Surviving Spouse of Carolyn S. Doss v. Deborah Robinson ( 2016 )


Menu:
  •                             Fourth Court of Appeals
    San Antonio, Texas
    October 24, 2016
    No. 04-16-00560-CV
    Louis V. DOSS, Individually, and as Surviving Spouse of Carolyn S. Doss,
    Appellant
    v.
    Deborah ROBINSON,
    Appellee
    From the 198th Judicial District Court, Kerr County, Texas
    Trial Court No. 11-320-B
    Honorable Stephen B. Ables, Judge Presiding
    SHOW CAUSE ORDER
    Louis V. Doss, individually, and as surviving spouse of Carolyn S. Doss, appeals a
    judgment of dismissal signed by the trial court on May 23, 2016. Doss timely filed a motion to
    reinstate that extended the time for perfecting an appeal. See TEX. R. CIV. P. 329b(g); TEX. R.
    APP. P. 26.1(a). Thus, the notice of appeal was due August 21, 2016, or a motion for extension of
    time to file the notice of appeal was due fifteen days later on September 5, 2016. See TEX. R.
    APP. P. 26.1, 26.3. The certificate of service accompanying the notice of appeal states it was
    mailed to this court on August 29, 2016, and the notice of appeal was filed in the trial court on
    August 31, 2016. Voss did not file a motion for extension of time to file the notice of appeal.
    A motion for extension of time is necessarily implied when an appellant, acting in good
    faith, files a notice of appeal beyond the time allowed by Rule 26.1 but within the fifteen-day
    grace period provided by Rule 26.3 for filing a motion for extension of time. See Verburgt v.
    Dorner, 
    959 S.W.2d 615
    , 615 (1997) (construing the predecessor to Rule 26). However, the
    appellant must offer a reasonable explanation for failing to file the notice of appeal timely. See
    id.; Tex. R. App. P. 26.3, 10.5(b)(1)(C); see also Hone v. Hanafin, 
    104 S.W.3d 884
    , 886-87
    (Tex. 2003) (holding “a reasonable explanation” is any plausible statement of circumstances
    indicating that failure to timely file was not deliberate or intentional, but was the result of
    inadvertence, mistake or mischance, and that “any conduct short of deliberate or intentional
    noncompliance qualifies as inadvertence, mistake or mischance”).
    We therefore order appellant to file a response due by November 8, 2016, providing a
    reasonable explanation for the untimely filing of the notice of appeal or otherwise showing cause
    why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. If appellant fails to
    satisfactorily respond within the time provided, the appeal will be dismissed. See TEX. R.
    APP. P. 42.3(a), (c).
    All deadlines in this matter are suspended until further order of the court.
    _________________________________
    Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
    IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said
    court on this 24th day of October, 2016.
    ___________________________________
    Keith E. Hottle
    Clerk of Court
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 04-16-00560-CV

Filed Date: 10/24/2016

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/31/2016