sherrill-lynn-barton-in-her-capacities-as-independent-and-trustee-of-the ( 2000 )


Menu:
  • Sherrill Lynn Barton, et al. v. Rockland Pipeline Company






      IN THE

    TENTH COURT OF APPEALS


    No. 10-99-272-CV


         SHERRILL LYNN BARTON, ET AL.,

                                                                                  Appellants

         v.


         ROCKLAND PIPELINE COMPANY,

                                                                                  Appellee


    From the 87th District Court

    Freestone County, Texas

    Trial Court # 96-276-B

    MEMORANDUM OPINION

          On June 30, 2000, Appellant Sherrill Lynn Barton, in her capacities as Independent Executrix and Trustee of the estate and under the will of Glenda McSwane Hughes and as Independent Executrix of the estate of Lesta Whitaker McSwane and as successor Trustee of the Cynthia Ann Hughes Glover trust, Appellant Cynthia Ann Hughes, individually and in her capacities as Independent Executrix and Trustee of the estate and under the will of R.Q. McSwane, and Appellant B. Richardson, Inc., and Appellee Rockland Pipeline Company filed an agreed motion to dismiss their respective appeals. In relevant portion, Rule 42.1(a) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provides:

    (a) The appellate court may dispose of an appeal as follows:

     

                (1) in accordance with an agreement signed by all parties or their attorneys and filed with the clerk; or

     

    (2) in accordance with a motion of appellant to dismiss the appeal or affirm the appealed judgment or order; but no other party may be prevented from seeking any relief to which it would otherwise be entitled.

    Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a).

          The agreed motion was signed by the parties’ attorneys. In the motion, the parties state that the cause has been fully settled and ask that we dismiss the appeal in its entirety. Accordingly, this cause is dismissed. Costs are taxed against the party incurring them, in accordance with the parties’ motion.

     

                                                                       PER CURIAM


    Before Chief Justice Davis,

          Justice Vance, and

          Justice Gray

    Dismissed

    Opinion delivered and filed July 19, 2000

    Do not publish

    ign: justify">Opinion delivered and filed January 14, 2004

    Do not publish

    [CR25]

Document Info

Docket Number: 10-99-00272-CV

Filed Date: 7/19/2000

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/1/2016