nnn-met-center-10-1-llc-nnn-met-center-10-2-llc-nnn-met-center-10-3-llc ( 2011 )

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

---

NO. 03-11-00029-CV

---

NNN Met Center 10-1, LLC; NNN Met Center 10-2, LLC; NNN Met Center 10-3, LLC; NNN Met Center 10-4, LLC; NNN Met Center 10-5, LLC; NNN Met Center 10-6, LLC; NNN Met Center 10-7, LLC; NNN Met Center 10-8, LLC; NNN Met Center 10-9, LLC; NNN Met Center 10-10, LLC; NNN Met Center 10-11, LLC; NNN Met Center 10-13, LLC; NNN Met Center 10-14, LLC; NNN Met Center 10-15, LLC; NNN Met Center 10-16, LLC; NNN Met Center 10-17, LLC; NNN Met Center 10-18, LLC; NNN Met Center 10-19, LLC; NNN Met Center 10-20, LLC; NNN Met Center 10-21, LLC; NNN Met Center 10-22, LLC; NNN Met Center 10-23, LLC; NNN Met Center 10-24, LLC; NNN Met Center 10-25, LLC; NNN Met Center 10-26, LLC; NNN Met Center 10-27, LLC; and

NNN Met Center 10-28, LLC, Appellants

v.

BACM 2005-3 Met Center Office, LLC; Mark L. Patterson; Jeffrey J. Zissa;

R. Terry Miller; E. Joe Berger, III; John A. Bain; Michael C. Elrod; Beverly A. Houston; Juanita Strickland; Janie Mucha; LNR Partners, LLC; and

Barclays Capital Real Estate, Inc., Appellees

---

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 98TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. D-1-GN-10-004498, HONORABLE STEPHEN YELENOSKY, JUDGE PRESIDING

---

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N  

We previously abated this appeal because, as a result of NNN Met Center 10-25's filing for bankruptcy protection in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of California, this suit has been automatically stayed. ⁽¹⁾ See Tex. R. App. P. 8. Appellants have filed an unopposed motion to extend abatement, informing us that the automatic stay has been extended until February 28, 2012. We grant appellants' motion.

Any party may file a motion to reinstate the appeal if permitted by federal law or the bankruptcy court. See Tex. R. App. P. 8.3. It is the parties' responsibility to notify the Court as soon as possible if an event occurs that would allow reinstatement. Id. Failure to notify this Court of a lift of the automatic stay or the conclusion of the bankruptcy proceeding may result in dismissal of the case for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b).

__________________________________________

Bob Pemberton, Justice

Before Justices Puryear, Pemberton and Rose

Bankruptcy

Filed: November 17, 2011

1. See 11 U.S.C. § 362.