in Re X.J. F. ( 2019 )


Menu:
  •                                 Fourth Court of Appeals
    San Antonio, Texas
    August 5, 2019
    No. 04-19-00397-CV
    IN RE X.J.F.
    From the County Court, Atascosa County, Texas
    Trial Court No. 16-08-0720-CVA
    Honorable Lynn Ellison, Judge Presiding
    ORDER
    The trial court signed a final judgment on February 21, 2019. Appellant filed a timely
    motion for new trial on March 22, 2019. Therefore, the notice of appeal was due to be filed on
    May 22, 2019. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1(a). A motion for extension of time to file the notice of
    appeal was due on June 6, 2019. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.3. Although appellant filed a notice of
    appeal within the fifteen-day grace period allowed by Rule 26.3, he did not file a motion for
    extension of time.1
    A motion for extension of time is necessarily implied when an appellant, acting in good
    faith, files a notice of appeal beyond the time allowed by Rule 26.1 but within the fifteen-day
    grace period provided by Rule 26.3 for filing a motion for extension of time. See Verburgt v.
    Dorner, 
    959 S.W.2d 615
    , 617 (Tex. 1997) (construing the predecessor to Rule 26). However,
    the appellant must offer a reasonable explanation for failing to file the notice of appeal in a
    timely manner. See id.; TEX. R. APP. P. 26.3, 10.5(b)(1)(C).
    It is therefore ORDERED that appellant file, within fifteen days from the date of this
    order, a response presenting a reasonable explanation for failing to file the notice of appeal in a
    timely manner. If appellant fails to respond within the time provided, the appeal will be
    dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c). All other appellate deadlines are suspended until further
    order of this court.
    _________________________________
    Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice
    1
    Appellant also filed an amended notice of appeal, seeking to appeal from the trial court’s denial of appellant’s
    motion for new trial; however, only the portion of that order that enters a new judgment on attorney’s fees is
    appealable. See Fain v. Georgen, 03-17-00313-CV, 
    2017 WL 4766654
    , at *2 (Tex. App.—Austin Oct. 19, 2017, no
    pet.) (explaining that a motion for new trial is not independently appealable).
    IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said
    court on this 5th day of August, 2019.
    ___________________________________
    Keith E. Hottle,
    Clerk of Court
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 04-19-00397-CV

Filed Date: 8/5/2019

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 8/8/2019