David Allen Schwab v. State ( 2018 )


Menu:
  •                             NUMBER 13-18-00317-CR
    COURT OF APPEALS
    THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
    CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
    ____________________________________________________________
    DAVID ALLEN SCHWAB,                                                         Appellant,
    v.
    THE STATE OF TEXAS,                                 Appellee.
    ____________________________________________________________
    On appeal from the 377th District Court
    of Victoria County, Texas.
    ____________________________________________________________
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Benavides
    Memorandum Opinion by Justice Benavides
    Appellant, David Allen Schwab, attempted to perfect an appeal from a conviction
    for aggravated assault. We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.
    This Court's appellate jurisdiction in a criminal case is invoked by a timely filed
    notice of appeal. Olivo v. State, 
    918 S.W.2d 519
    , 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). Absent
    a timely filed notice of appeal, a court of appeals does not have jurisdiction to address the
    merits of the appeal and can take no action other than to dismiss the appeal for want of
    jurisdiction. Slaton v. State, 
    981 S.W.2d 208
    , 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998).
    The trial court imposed sentence in this matter on December 8, 2017. Appellant
    filed his notice of appeal on June 21, 2018. On June 21, 2018, the Clerk of this Court
    notified appellant that it appeared that the appeal was not timely perfected and that the
    appeal would be dismissed if the defect was not corrected within ten days from the date
    of receipt of the Court’s directive. 1          Appellant requested and this Court granted an
    extension to file a response until August 13, 2018. Appellant has not filed a response to
    the Court’s directive.
    Unless a motion for new trial has been timely filed, a notice of appeal must be filed
    within thirty days after the day sentence is imposed or suspended in open court, or after
    the day the trial court enters an appealable order. TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a)(1). Where a
    timely motion for new trial has been filed, the notice of appeal must be filed within ninety
    days after the day sentence is imposed or suspended in open court. See 
    id. 26.2(a)(2). The
    time within which to file the notice may be enlarged if, within fifteen days after the
    deadline for filing the notice, the party files the notice of appeal and a motion complying
    with Rule 10.5(b) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See 
    id. 26.3. 1The
    trial court’s certification of the defendant’s right to appeal shows this is a plea bargain case
    and the defendant has no right of appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2).
    2
    Appellant’s notice of appeal, filed more than six months after sentence was
    imposed, was untimely, and accordingly, we lack jurisdiction over the appeal.         See
    
    Slaton, 981 S.W.2d at 210
    . Appellant may be entitled to an out-of-time appeal by filing
    a post-conviction writ of habeas corpus returnable to the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals;
    however, the availability of that remedy is beyond the jurisdiction of this Court. See TEX.
    CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 11.07, § 3(a) (West, Westlaw through 2017 1st C.S.); see
    also Ex parte Garcia, 
    988 S.W.2d 240
    (Tex. Crim. App. 1999).
    The appeal is DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION. All pending motions
    are likewise dismissed.
    GINA M. BENAVIDES,
    Justice
    Do not publish.
    See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
    Delivered and filed the
    29th day of August, 2018.
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 13-18-00317-CR

Filed Date: 8/29/2018

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 8/30/2018