Ex Parte Brent Wayne Justice ( 2017 )


Menu:
  • Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed October 19, 2017.
    In The
    Fourteenth Court of Appeals
    NO. 14-15-00934-CR
    EX PARTE BRENT WAYNE JUSTICE
    On Appeal from the 176th District Court
    Harris County, Texas
    Trial Court Cause No. 1385768
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    Appellant filed a pretrial application for writ of habeas corpus, arguing pro se
    that he should be released from confinement because Section 12.35(c)(1) of the
    Texas Penal Code is “overbroad and facially invalid, and that any conviction secured
    under it would be unconstitutional.” The trial court denied relief and an appeal was
    brought to this court.
    After the appeal was filed here, appellant was tried and convicted of the
    underlying offense that was the subject of his pretrial habeas application. A direct
    appeal of that conviction was also brought to this court, in appeal number 14-16-
    00153-CR. On our own motion, we consolidated the habeas appeal with the direct
    appeal.
    In the direct appeal, which we decided today in a separate opinion, we
    reformed appellant’s judgment of conviction and remanded for a new hearing on
    punishment only. The arguments presented in appellant’s habeas application would
    provide no basis for lifting the restraint on his liberty.
    With the exception of double-jeopardy issues, which have not been raised
    here, “pretrial habeas is not appropriate when the question presented, even if
    resolved in the defendant’s favor, would not result in immediate release.” See Ex
    parte Doster, 
    303 S.W.3d 720
    , 724 (Tex. Crim. App. 2010). Therefore, appellant’s
    challenges to his pretrial confinement are moot. See Martinez v. State, 
    826 S.W.2d 620
    , 620 (Tex. Crim. App. 1992); Saucedo v. State, 
    795 S.W.2d 8
    , 9 (Tex. App.—
    Houston [14th Dist.] 1990, no pet.) (“Where the premise of a habeas corpus
    application is destroyed by subsequent developments, the legal issues raised
    thereunder are rendered moot.”).
    Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal as moot.
    /s/       Tracy Christopher
    Justice
    Panel consists of Justices Christopher, Brown, and Wise.
    Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 14-15-00934-CR

Filed Date: 10/19/2017

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/23/2017